ArticleInnovation in aging2022
Cost-Benefit Analysis of the COPE Program for Persons Living With Dementia: Toward a Payment Model.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02365051 (Translation of COPE for Publicly-Funded Home Care Clients and Their Families), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Translation of COPE for Publicly-Funded Home Care Clients and Their Families
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Interventions for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations and a Review of Reviews.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2023Pooled it
- Economic Analysis of the Tailored Activity Program: A Nonpharmacological Approach to Improve Quality of Life in People Living With Dementia and their Caregivers.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2023Trial
- Supporting Family Caregiver Health in Heart Failure: Longitudinal Associations Between Heart Failure Caregiver Self-Care and Patient Hospitalizations.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Article
- The cost of non-drug interventions that improve function and reduce dementia-related behaviors.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Cost-benefit analysis of interventions for dementia: a scoping review.Innovation in aging · 2025Review
- Toward a payment model for augmenting Adult Day Services (ADS) with caregiver support: costs, willingness, and ability to pay for the ADS Plus program.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Using Hybrid Effectiveness Studies to Facilitate Implementation in Community-Based Settings: Three Case Studies in Dementia Care Research.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2024Article
- The Case for Conducting Pragmatic Dementia Care Trials in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Settings.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2023Article
- Implementing the Care of Persons With Dementia in Their Environments (COPE) Intervention in Community-Based Programs: Acceptability and Perceived Benefit From Care Managers' and Interventionists' Perspectives.The Gerontologist · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThere is a critical need for effective interventions to support quality of life for persons living with dementia and their caregivers. Growing evidence supports nonpharmacologic programs that provide care management, disease education, skills training, and support. This cost-benefit analysis examined whether the Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments (COPE) program achieves cost savings when incorporated into Connecticut's home- and community-based services (HCBS), which are state- and Medicaid-funded. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsFindings are based on a pragmatic trial where persons living with dementia and their caregiver dyads were randomly assigned to COPE with HCBS, or HCBS alone. Cost measures included those relevant to HCBS decision makers: intervention delivery, health care utilization, caregiver time, formal care, and social services. Data sources included care management records and caregiver report.
resultsPer-dyad mean cost savings at 12 months were $2 354 for those who received COPE with a mean difference-in-difference of -$6 667 versus HCBS alone (95% CI: -$15 473, $2 734; not statistically significant). COPE costs would consume 5.6%-11.3% of Connecticut's HCBS annual spending limit, and HCBS cost-sharing requirements align with participants' willingness to pay for COPE. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: COPE represents a potentially cost-saving dementia care service that could be financed through existing Connecticut HCBS. HCBS programs represent an important, sustainable payment model for delivering nonpharmacological dementia interventions such as COPE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.