Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047708›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2022

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the COPE Program for Persons Living With Dementia: Toward a Payment Model.

Laura T Pizzi, Eric Jutkowitz, Katherine M Prioli, Ember Yiwei Lu, Zachary Babcock, Heather McAbee-Sevick, Dorothy B Wakefield, Julie Robison, Sheila Molony, Catherine V Piersol and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02365051 (Translation of COPE for Publicly-Funded Home Care Clients and Their Families), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02365051 nacompletednot on this map

Translation of COPE for Publicly-Funded Home Care Clients and Their Families

TypeinterventionalSponsorUConn HealthRan2015 to 2019Enrolled582ConditionsDementia, Alzheimer's DiseaseArmsCare of Persons with Dementia in their Environments
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura T PizziCenter for Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Eric JutkowitzDepartment of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Katherine M PrioliCenter for Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Ember Yiwei LuCenter for Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7944-5306
Zachary BabcockErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Heather McAbee-SevickCenter on Aging, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Dorothy B WakefieldCenter on Aging, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Julie RobisonCenter on Aging, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Sheila MolonySchool of Nursing, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA.
Catherine V PiersolDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura N GitlinCollege of Nursing and Health Professions and AgeWell Collaboratory, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Richard H FortinskyCenter on Aging, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Translation of COPE for Publicly-Funded Home Care Clients and their FamiliesR01AG044504 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI FORTINSKY, RICHARD H · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThere is a critical need for effective interventions to support quality of life for persons living with dementia and their caregivers. Growing evidence supports nonpharmacologic programs that provide care management, disease education, skills training, and support. This cost-benefit analysis examined whether the Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments (COPE) program achieves cost savings when incorporated into Connecticut's home- and community-based services (HCBS), which are state- and Medicaid-funded. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsFindings are based on a pragmatic trial where persons living with dementia and their caregiver dyads were randomly assigned to COPE with HCBS, or HCBS alone. Cost measures included those relevant to HCBS decision makers: intervention delivery, health care utilization, caregiver time, formal care, and social services. Data sources included care management records and caregiver report.

resultsPer-dyad mean cost savings at 12 months were $2 354 for those who received COPE with a mean difference-in-difference of -$6 667 versus HCBS alone (95% CI: -$15 473, $2 734; not statistically significant). COPE costs would consume 5.6%-11.3% of Connecticut's HCBS annual spending limit, and HCBS cost-sharing requirements align with participants' willingness to pay for COPE. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: COPE represents a potentially cost-saving dementia care service that could be financed through existing Connecticut HCBS. HCBS programs represent an important, sustainable payment model for delivering nonpharmacological dementia interventions such as COPE.

Indexed as

Health care policyHealth economicsHome- and community-based servicesMedicaid/MedicarePragmatic trial

Identifiers

PMID35047708
PMCPMC8763605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.