Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047705›Full record

ArticleBMJ open science2021

Stability testing of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine: a translational study in UK vaccination centres.

Laila Kudsiova, Alison Lansley, Greg Scutt, Marcus Allen, Lucas Bowler, Sian Williams, Samantha Lippett, Selma Stafford, Michael Tarzi, Michael Cross and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Visualizing lipid nanoparticle trafficking for mRNA vaccine delivery in non-human primates.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Drug Product Development of Lipid Nanoparticle-Based mRNA Therapeutics and Vaccines.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laila KudsiovaCentre for Stress and Age-Related Disease, and Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Devices, School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4028-5859
Alison LansleyCentre for Stress and Age-Related Disease and Biomaterials and Drug Delivery Research and Enterprise Group, School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Greg ScuttMedicines Optimisation Research and Enterprise Group, School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Marcus AllenCentre for Stress and Age-Related Disease, School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Lucas BowlerCentre for Stress and Age-Related Disease, School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Sian WilliamsMedicines Optimisation Research and Enterprise Group, School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Samantha LippettUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Selma StaffordIndependent General Practitioner, Brighton, UK.
Michael TarziUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Michael CrossUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Michael OkorieUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
University of Brighton · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe roll-out of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine has brought many logistical challenges, such as the absence of comprehensive stability data leading to strict handling instructions during dilution and administration. Accidental mishandling therefore presents challenging clinical dilemmas, which often led vaccine providers to err on the side of caution and discard mishandled vials rather than risk administering ineffective vaccine. This study aims to answer key questions about the vaccine's stability to allow for a more informed decision-making process should a non-conformity occur.

methodsResidual vaccine in freshly used, but appropriately stored vials collected from vaccination centres in Brighton, UK, were tested after exposure to various handling conditions and analysed by dynamic light scattering to determine the size of the lipid-mRNA nanoparticles, and gel electrophoresis to visualise the mRNA integrity and separation from the lipid formulation.

resultsKnocking or dropping vaccine samples from small heights resulted in lowest levels of instability, indicating low risk of compromising clinical efficacy. However, repeated drawing and injecting through 23 G needles at high speed and, more significantly, shaking and vortexing led to progressive increase in the size and polydispersity index of the lipid-mRNA nanoparticles, coupled with or caused by up to ~50% release of mRNA from the lipid formulation. This is thought to impact the vaccine's efficacy due to lack of free mRNA protection and cellular internalisation.

conclusionsThese results reiterate the importance of adhering to the manufacturer's instructions on handling, especially with regard to shaking and exposing the vaccine to excessive vibration.

Indexed as

COVID-19lipid nanoparticlesmessengerRNAspike proteinvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35047705
PMCPMC8647588
OpenAlexW3194473711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.