ArticleTransplantation direct2022
The Interaction of Amiodarone and Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Use in Risk of Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Heart Transplantation.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amiodarone use prior to cardiac transplant in children is associated with increased need for post-transplant chronotropic support.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation-a systematic review and meta-analysis.JHLT open · 2026Review
- High-volume centers achieve superior outcomes in left ventricular assist device explant-heart transplantation.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Ablation Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Drug therapy and catheter ablation for management of arrhythmias in continuous flow left ventricular assist device's patients: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary graft dysfunction (PGD) increases morbidity and mortality after heart transplant. Here we investigated (1) the association of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD), amiodarone, and severe PGD and (2) the safety of amiodarone discontinuation in CF-LVAD patients.
methodsRetrospective, single-center study of heart transplant recipients was conducted to investigate the association of risk factors and severe PGD. Patients were grouped into 4 groups based on the presence (denoted +) or absence (denoted -) of amiodarone and CF-LVAD. Prospective amiodarone discontinuation was undertaken to investigate its safety in a cohort of CF-LVAD patients. Study endpoints were severe PGD and recurrence of arrhythmia.
resultsSevere PGD was strongly associated with CF-LVAD and amiodarone use, and its prevalence is highest if both risk factors were present (CF-LVAD-/amiodarone - 1.5%, CF-LVAD -/amiodarone+ 4.5%, CF-LVAD+/amiodarone - 7.1%, CF-LVAD+/amiodarone+ 21.8%;
conclusionsAmiodarone and CF-LVAD were independently associated with severe PGD. The combination of both risk factors was associated with a higher prevalence of severe PGD. Amiodarone discontinuation was associated with recurrence of arrhythmia in 6 CF-LVAD patients. There was no mortality associated with amiodarone discontinuation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.