Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047354›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2022

Effectiveness of oral probiotics supplementation in the treatment of adult small chalazion.

Mariaelena Filippelli, Roberto dell'Omo, Angela Amoruso, Ilaria Paiano, Marco Pane, Pasquale Napolitano, Giuseppe Campagna, Silvia Bartollino, Ciro Costagliola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Role of gut microbiomes in different ocular pathologies: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Targeting the Gut-Eye Axis: An Emerging Strategy to Face Ocular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Suggestions on gut-eye cross-talk: about the chalazion.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariaelena FilippelliDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Molise 86100, Italy.
Roberto dell'OmoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Molise 86100, Italy.
Angela AmorusoProbiotical Research Srl, R&D Department, Novara, Piemonte 28100, Italy.
Ilaria PaianoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Molise 86100, Italy.
Marco PaneProbiotical Research Srl, R&D Department, Novara, Piemonte 28100, Italy.
Pasquale NapolitanoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Molise 86100, Italy.
Giuseppe CampagnaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome 00185, Italy.
Silvia BartollinoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Molise 86100, Italy.
Ciro CostagliolaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Molise 86100, Italy.
University of Molise · ITProbiotical (Italy) · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo define the possible beneficial impact of probiotics oral supplementation on patients affected by chalazion.

methodsProspective comparative pilot study on 20 adults suffering from chalazion randomly divided into two groups. The first group (

resultsMedical treatment with or without probiotics supplementation was effective only on the small size chalazia. There was a significant difference in the time taken for complete resolution of small size chalazia between the two groups in favor of the patients receiving probiotics (38.50±9.04d

conclusionThe considerable difference in time taken for complete resolution of small chalazia between the two groups in favor of the experimental one confirms the presence of a gut-eye axis.

Indexed as

adultschalaziosismicrobiomeprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35047354
PMCPMC8720352
OpenAlexW4200255502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.