ReviewEndoscopy international open2022
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: outcomes and predictors of recurrence.
Review in Endoscopy international open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of different traction numbers in endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Reply to Gkegkes et al.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Acute Kidney Injury: A Rare but Clinically Relevant Adverse Event, a Cohort Study of 1537 Patients.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- A predictive nomogram for hemorrhage risk following endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal tumors: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Inflammatory Hyperplastic Mass Mimicking Local Recurrence Following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of a Colonic Adenoma.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for proximal colonic lesions: An effective therapeutic option.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.