ArticleEndoscopy international open2022
UK Joint Advisory Group consensus statements for training and certification in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Development of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy standards for training in advanced endoscopy within dedicated advanced endoscopy fellowship programs.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Guideline
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training conditions, results from a pan-European survey: Between vision and reality.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography services in Sudan during wartime: Innovations in crisis.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- What is the role of out of programme clinical fellowships in the era of Shape of Training? A single-centre cohort study.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Quality indicators in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a brief review of established guidelines.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Culture of continuous improvement.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review.Endoscopy international open · 2023Review
- Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Prevention, Diagnosis and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.