Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047297›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Rishab Belavadi, Sri Vallabh Reddy Gudigopuram, Ciri C Raguthu, Harini Gajjela, Iljena Kela, Chandra L Kakarala, Mohammad Hassan, Ibrahim Sange

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preventive clipping versus coiling in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review to explore safety and efficacy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A review and journey in intrasaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Rishab BelavadiSurgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, IND.
Sri Vallabh Reddy GudigopuramResearch, Our Lady of Fatima University College of Medicine, Valenzuela, PHL.
Ciri C RaguthuResearch, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, CHN.
Harini GajjelaResearch, Our Lady of Fatima University College of Medicine, Valenzuela, PHL.
Iljena KelaFamily Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, POL.
Chandra L KakaralaInternal Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, IND.
Mohammad HassanInternal Medicine, Mohi-ud-Din Islamic Medical College, Mirpur, PAK.
Ibrahim SangeResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University · PKOur Lady of Fatima University · PHCalifornia Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · USJagiellonian University · PLJawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INK J Somaiya Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial aneurysms are pathological dilatations of intracranial arteries and prevail in around 3.2% of the general population. The worst outcome of an aneurysm is its rupture. Its prevention and management can be accomplished by two broad modalities: surgical clipping and endovascular coiling. This review has explored each of these approaches individually and has then directly compared them to provide a good understanding of their respective advantages and disadvantages over one another. Clipping is associated with a higher rate of occlusion of the aneurysm and lower rates of residual and recurrent aneurysms, whereas coiling is associated with lower morbidity and mortality and a better postoperative course. The risks and benefits of each of these procedures must be thoroughly examined in each case. This article has stressed the need to consider all contributing patient, procedure-related, surgeon-related, and hospital factors before arriving at a final decision to manage a specific case.

Indexed as

clippingcoilingendovascular coilingintracranial aneurysmneurosurgerysurgical clippingvascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID35047297
PMCPMC8760002
OpenAlexW4200480138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.