Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047250›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

A Revised Comorbidity Model for Administrative Databases Using Clinical Classifications Software Refined Variables.

Hafeez Shaka, Ehizogie Edigin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association of Diagnostic Discrepancy with Length of Stay and Mortality in Congestive Heart Failure Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hafeez ShakaInternal Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, USA.
Ehizogie EdiginRheumatology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective Database research has shaped policies, identified trends, and informed healthcare guidelines for numerous disease conditions. However, despite their abundant uses and vast potential, administrative databases have several limitations. Adjusting outcomes for comorbidities is often needed during database analysis as a means of overcoming non-randomization. We sought to obtain a model for comorbidity adjustment based on Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) variables and compare this with current models. Our aim was to provide a simplified, adaptable, and accurate measure for comorbidities in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) databases, in order to strengthen the validity of outcomes.  Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for 2018 was the data source. We obtained the mortality rate among all included hospitalizations in the dataset. A model based on CCSR categories was mapped from disease groups in Sundararajan's adaptation of the modified Deyo's Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We employed logistic regression analysis to obtain the final model using CCSR variables as binary variables. We tested the final model on the 10 most common reasons for hospitalizations. Results The model had a higher area under the curve (AUC) compared to the three modalities of the CCI studied in all the categories. Also, the model had a higher AUC compared to the Elixhauser model in 8/10 categories. However, the model did not have a higher AUC compared to a model made from stepwise backward regression analysis of the original 21-variable model. Conclusion We developed a 15-CCSR-variable model that showed good discrimination for inpatient mortality compared to prior models.

Indexed as

ccsrcomorbidity modelsdatabase studyhospital outcomesmortality index

Identifiers

PMID35047250
PMCPMC8756739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.