ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021
A retrospective case study of successful translational research: Gazelle Hb variant point-of-care diagnostic device for sickle cell disease.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thermodynamic Frontiers in Hemoglobin-Inspired Polymer Science for Diagnosis and Modulation of Neurodegenerative Diseases.Cell biochemistry and function · 2026Review
- Validation of the Gazelle point-of-care device for hemoglobin variant analysis in a predominantly pediatric population: performance comparison with conventional electrophoresis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Demonstrating public health impacts of translational science at the clinical and translational science collaborative (CTSC) of northern Ohio: a mixed-methods approach using the translational science benefits model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A multiplexed, allele-specific recombinase polymerase amplification assay with lateral flow readout for sickle cell disease detection.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- New voices for a better society.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Next generation microfluidics: fulfilling the promise of lab-on-a-chip technologies.Lab on a chip · 2024Review
- Point-of-Care Diagnostic Test for Beta-Thalassemia.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Molecular Detection of Hemoglobin O-Arab in the Sudanese Population.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Adapting an Expanded Access program to enable investigational treatments for COVID-19.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluation researchers at Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs are conducting retrospective case studies to evaluate the translational research process. The objective of this study was to deepen knowledge of the translational process and identify contributors to successful translation. We investigated the successful translation of the HemeChip, a low-cost point-of-care diagnostic device for sickle cell disease, using a protocol for retrospective translational science case studies of health interventions developed by evaluators at the National Health Institutes (NIH) and CTSA hubs. Development of the HemeChip began in 2013 and evidence of device use and impact on public health is growing. Data collection methods included five interviews and a review of press, publications, patents, and grants. Barriers to translation included proving novelty, manufacturing costs, fundraising, and academic-industry relations. Facilitators to translation were CTSA pilot program funding, university resources, entrepreneurship training, due diligence, and collaborations. The barriers to translation, how they were overcome, and the key facilitators identified in this case study pinpoint areas for consideration in future funding mechanisms and the infrastructure required to enable successful translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.