Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047213›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021

Implementation context for addressing social needs in a learning health system: a qualitative study.

Ryan P Theis, Katherine Blackburn, Gloria Lipori, Christopher A Harle, Michelle M Alvarado, Peter J Carek, Nadine Zemon, Angela Howard, Ramzi G Salloum, Elizabeth A Shenkman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan P TheisDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9924-6999
Katherine BlackburnDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Gloria LiporiLearning Health System Program, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Christopher A HarleDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Michelle M AlvaradoLearning Health System Program, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Peter J CarekLearning Health System Program, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nadine ZemonLearning Health System Program, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Angela HowardLearning Health System Program, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ramzi G SalloumDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Elizabeth A ShenkmanDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
UF CTSI Learning Health System Program
University of Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnmet social needs contribute to growing health disparities and rising health care costs. Strategies to collect and integrate information on social needs into patients' electronic health records (EHRs) show promise for connecting patients with community resources. However, gaps remain in understanding the contextual factors that impact implementing these interventions in clinical settings.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with patients and focus groups with providers (January-September 2020) in two primary care clinics to inform the implementation of a module that collects and integrates patient-reported social needs information into the EHR. Questions addressed constructs within the Theoretical Framework for Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Data were coded deductively using team-based framework analysis, followed by inductive coding and matrix analyses.

resultsForty patients participated in interviews, with 20 recruited at the clinics and 20 from home. Two focus groups were conducted with a total of 12 providers. Factors salient to acceptability and feasibility included patients' discomfort answering sensitive questions, concerns about privacy, difficulty reading/understanding module content, and technological literacy. Rapport with providers was a facilitator for patients to discuss social needs. Providers stressed that limited time with patients would be a barrier, and expressed concerns about the lack of available community resources.

conclusionFindings highlight the need for flexible approaches to assessing and discussing social needs with patients. Feasibility of the intervention is contingent upon support from the health system to facilitate social needs assessment and discussion. Further study of availability of community resources is needed to ensure intervention effectiveness.

Indexed as

electronic health recordsimplementation sciencequalitative researchsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID35047213
PMCPMC8727713
OpenAlexW3196698013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.