Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047110›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2022

Integrating Incompatible Assay Data Sets with Deep Preference Learning.

Xiaolin Sun, Ryo Tamura, Masato Sumita, Kenichi Mori, Kei Terayama, Koji Tsuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaolin SunGraduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan.
Ryo TamuraGraduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0349-358X
Masato SumitaInternational Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (WPI-MANA), National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan.
Kenichi MoriAstellas Pharma Inc., Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8585, Japan.
Kei TerayamaRIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-248X
Koji TsudaGraduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-1606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large amount of bioactivity assay data is already accumulated in public databases, but the integration of these data sets for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies is not straightforward due to differences in experimental methods and settings. We present an efficient deep-learning-based approach called Deep Preference Data Integration (DPDI). For integrating outcome variables of different assay types, a surrogate variable is introduced, and a neural network is trained such that the total order induced by the surrogate variable is maximally consistent with given data sets. In a task of predicting efficacy of factor Xa inhibitors, DPDI successfully integrated 2959 molecules distributed in 129 assay data sets. In most of our experiments, data integration improved prediction accuracy strongly in interpolation and extrapolation tasks, indicating that DPDI is an effective tool for QSAR studies.

Identifiers

PMID35047110
PMCPMC8762726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.