Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047072›Full record

ReviewEcancermedicalscience2021

Progress in palliative care for cancer in Turkey: a review of the literature.

Tezer Kutluk, Fahad Ahmed, Mustafa Cemaloğlu, Burça Aydın, Meltem Şengelen, Meral Kirazli, Sema Yurduşen, Richard Sullivan, Richard Harding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The effect of two different types of music played to cancer patients during chemotherapy on anxiety, nausea, and satisfaction levels.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development of Cancer Palliative Care in Turkey.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tezer KutlukDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Institute, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Fahad AhmedDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Institute, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Mustafa CemaloğluDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Institute, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Burça AydınDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Institute, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Meltem ŞengelenDepartment of Public Health, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Meral KirazliDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Institute, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Sema YurduşenDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Institute, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Richard SullivanKing's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy, Conflict & Health Research Group, London, UK.
Richard HardingFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demographic transition in Turkey is shifting the burden of diseases towards non-communicable diseases including cancer. Palliative care (PC) as a component of Universal Health Coverage assures patient and family-centred care provision throughout the spectrum of cancer.

objectivesThis study aimed to make a detailed evaluation of the progress achieved since the mid-90s and the current situation of cancer PC in Turkey.

methodsA literature review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Google Scholar, The Turkish Academic Network and Information Centre databases, Ministry of Health documents, Council of Higher Education's thesis 01/1995 to 07/2020. The information was categorised into the six domains: history of the cancer PC; law and regulations; education and research; opioid use; patient care and palliative centres; public awareness, psychosocial support and end of life ethics.

resultsOf 27,489 studies, 331 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were published in the Turkish language and were journal articles. The findings showed that the development of PC in Turkey can be divided into three stages: early initiatives before 2000, the dissemination stage, 2000-2010 and the advanced stage after 2010. There is evidence of progress in terms of legal regulations, opioid use and number of PC services and research output. However, there is still a need for improvement in professional education, public awareness and end of life care.

conclusionThere is evidence of progress, barriers and opportunities. However, bringing research into practice is needed for scale-up and integration of PC in cancer care in Turkey.

Indexed as

cancercapacity buildingpalliative caresystematic reviewTurkey

Identifiers

PMID35047072
PMCPMC8723752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.