Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35046714›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Linking Ambulance Records with Hospital and Death Index Data to Evaluate Patient Outcomes.

Emily Andrew, Shelley Cox, Karen Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mortality rates in Norwegian HEMS-a retrospective analysis from Central Norway.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily Andrew *Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Victoria, Australia.
Shelley Cox *Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Victoria, Australia.
Karen SmithCentre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Victoria, Australia.
Monash University · AUAmbulance Victoria · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLinkage of electronic administrative datasets is becoming increasingly common, offering a powerful resource for research and analysis. However, routine linkage of prehospital data with emergency department (ED) presentation and hospital admission datasets is rare. We describe a methodology used to link ambulance data with hospital ED presentations, admissions, and death records, and examine potential biases between matched and unmatched patients.

methodsIterative deterministic linkage methodologies were employed to link clinical, operational, and secondary triage ambulance data to ED presentations, hospital admissions, and death records in Victoria, Australia. Descriptive analyses and standardised differences were used to examine potential biases between matched and unmatched patients.

resultsA total of 2,813,913 ambulance records were available for linkage. Of the patients that were transported to a public ED (n=1,753,268), 83.3% matched with an ED record. Only small differences were observed between matched and unmatched patients for sex, year, time of day and attending crew type. The data elements with the largest standardised differences were patient age (0.25) and paramedic diagnosis (0.25). Matched patients were older (mean ± standard deviation: 55.6±25.7 vs 49.0±26.0 years) and more likely to have a paramedic-suspected cardiac, respiratory, neurological, or gastrointestinal/genitourinary condition, suspected infection/sepsis, or pain.

conclusionThis linked dataset will facilitate a large body of research into prehospital care and patient outcomes. Although future analysis of matched patients should acknowledge the linkage error rate, our findings suggest that results are likely to be generalisable to the broader ambulance population.

Indexed as

ambulancedata linkageoutcomesprehospital

Identifiers

PMID35046714
PMCPMC8763257
OpenAlexW4206571056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.