Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35046455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Diagnostic error rates and associated factors for lower gastrointestinal perforation.

Taku Harada, Takashi Watari, Satoshi Watanuki, Juichi Hiroshige, Seiko Kushiro, Taiju Miyagami, Syunsuke Syusa, Satoshi Suzuki, Tetsuya Hiyoshi, Suguru Hasegawa and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Taku HaradaDivision of General Medicine, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, 5-1-38 Toyosu Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8577, Japan. hrdtaku@gmail.com.
Takashi WatariGeneral Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Enya-cho, Japan.
Satoshi WatanukiDivision of Emergency and General Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan.
Juichi HiroshigeDivision of General Medicine, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, 5-1-38 Toyosu Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8577, Japan.
Seiko KushiroDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiju MiyagamiDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Syunsuke SyusaDepartment of General Medicine, Tone Chuo Hospital, Numata, Gunma, Japan.
Satoshi SuzukiDepartment of General Medicine, Tone Chuo Hospital, Numata, Gunma, Japan.
Tetsuya HiyoshiGeneral Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Suguru HasegawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shigeki NabeshimaGeneral Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hidetoshi AiharaDepartment of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Shun YamashitaDepartment of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Masaki TagoDepartment of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Fumitaka YoshimuraDepartment of General Medicine, Yushima Clinic, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kotaro KunitomoDepartment of General Medicine, Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takahiro TsujiDepartment of General Medicine, Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masanori HiroseDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomoya TsuchidaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taro ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lower gastrointestinal perforation is rare and challenging to diagnose in patients presenting with an acute abdomen. However, no study has examined the frequency and associated factors of diagnostic errors related to lower gastrointestinal perforation. This large-scale multicenter retrospective study investigated the frequency of diagnostic errors and identified the associated factors. Factors at the level of the patient, symptoms, situation, and physician were included in the analysis. Data were collected from nine institutions, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. Timely diagnosis was defined as diagnosis at the first visit in computed tomography (CT)-capable facilities or referral to an appropriate medical institution immediately following the first visit to a non-CT-capable facility. Cases not meeting this definition were defined as diagnostic errors that resulted in delayed diagnosis. Of the 439 cases of lower gastrointestinal perforation identified, delayed diagnosis occurred in 138 cases (31.4%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between examination by a non-generalist and delayed diagnosis. Other factors showing a tendency with delayed diagnosis included presence of fever, absence of abdominal tenderness, and unavailability of urgent radiology reports. Initial misdiagnoses were mainly gastroenteritis, constipation, and small bowel obstruction. In conclusion, diagnostic errors occurred in about one-third of patients with a lower gastrointestinal perforation.

Indexed as

Abdomen, AcuteAbdominal PainAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleFeverHumansIntestinal PerforationJapanMaleMiddle AgedNear Miss, HealthcarePhysiciansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35046455
PMCPMC8770624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.