ArticleScientific reports2022
Phenolic compound profile of probiotic (Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR5) fortified vegetable tablet and probiotic survival in the simulated gastrointestinal tract.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of Pectinase-Assisted Extraction from Date Palm and Development of a Quince-Jujube Ready-to-Drink Beverage: A Two-Stage Approach.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quality Evaluation and Shelf-Life Prediction of a Mixed Mango and Passion Fruit Smoothie Under Dimethyl Dicarbonate Treatment and Packaging Interventions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biopolymer-Based Gel Capsules for Improved Probiotic Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Potency of Dimethyl Dicarbonate on the Microbial Inhibition Growth Kinetics, and Quality of Passion Fruit (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cocoa Shell and Their Encapsulation in Gum Arabic and Maltodextrin: A Technology to Produce Functional Food Ingredients.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this research were to study the changes of phenolic compounds in vegetable (yellow VS green) tablets with/without probiotics (Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR5) supplementation by using high performance liquid chromatography and probiotic survivability through the simulated gastrointestinal tract. The green vegetable tablets with/without probiotics had a greater (p ≤ 0.05) phenolic content compared to the yellow ones. There were no significant differences of most phenolic compound contents between probiotic-supplemented vegetable tablets and non-probiotic supplemented ones (p > 0.05). The contents of ferulic acid, epicatechin, tannic acid and rutin for both vegetable tablets tended to decrease through passing the stomach (1 and 2 h) and small intestine (2 and 4 h), however, the content of catechin in the yellow vegetable tablets tended to increase. The results also showed that the survival of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR5 slightly decreased through the simulated gastrointestinal tract. The vibrations from FTIR appeared in the wave length of 4000-3100, 3000-2800 and 1652-1545 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.