Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35046416›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The gut microbiota of chickens in a commercial farm treated with a Salmonella phage cocktail.

Viviana Clavijo, Tatiana Morales, Martha Josefina Vives-Flores, Alejandro Reyes Muñoz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Effects of DietaryVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. SalmoFreePHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Viviana ClavijoGrupo de Investigación en Biología Computacional y Ecología Microbiana, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 #18A-12, Bogotá, Colombia.
Tatiana MoralesCentro de Investigaciones Microbiológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 Este #19A-40, Bogotá, Colombia.
Martha Josefina Vives-FloresCentro de Investigaciones Microbiológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 Este #19A-40, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alejandro Reyes MuñozGrupo de Investigación en Biología Computacional y Ecología Microbiana, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 #18A-12, Bogotá, Colombia. a.reyes@uniandes.edu.co.
Universidad de Los Andes · CO

Funding

Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS) 0845-2013Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de los Andes INV-2017-25-1117Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de los Andes INV-2018-48-1342Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de los Andes INV-2018-50-1399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota in broiler chicken intestines affects the animals' health, metabolism, and immunity both positively and negatively. Accordingly, it has a significant impact on animal productivity. Phages, host-specific parasites of bacterial cells, are a promising antimicrobial alternative that selectively target pathogens without disturbing the microbiota. The purpose of this study is to further characterize the commensal microbial community at production scale in broiler chickens treated with a Salmonella phage treatment. We evaluated the cecal microbiota of broilers reared in a commercial farming system where a phage cocktail against Salmonella, SalmoFree was supplied to animals. To do so, two field trials were conducted, incorporating three doses of phages in the broilers' drinking water. Our results showed that the core microbiome (taxa that were present in more than 50% of samples) contained species that are key to microbiota adaptation in the last stage of the production cycle. Among these, there are some important degraders of complex polysaccharides and producers of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) such as Eisenbergiella and Lachnoclostridium. The phage cocktail did not affect the normal development of the microbiota's structure. The addition of the phage cocktail resulted in a significant reduction in Campylobacter and an increase in Butyricimonas, Helicobacter and Rikenellaceae, which are common inhabitants in chicken gut with known negative and positive effects on their health and metabolism. Altogether, we consider that these results contribute valuable information to the implementation of large-scale phage therapy technologies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeSalmonella PhagesAdministration, OralAnimalsBacteriaCecumChickensPhage TherapyPoultry DiseasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35046416
PMCPMC8770602
OpenAlexW4206113838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.