ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022
Patients with Rare Cancers in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) Benefit from Genomics-Guided Treatment.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sinonasal malignancy: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.ESMO open · 2025Guideline
- Precision Oncology Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Phase II Clinical Trials with Biomarker-Driven, Adaptive Design.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Pooled it
- The pathway alteration load is a pan-cancer determinant of outcome of targeted therapies: results from the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).ESMO open · 2025Trial
- Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E-mutated rare cancers: the phase 2 ROAR trial.Nature medicine · 2023Trial
- Article
- A tumor profiling resource for ovarian cancer: insights into chemotherapy-driven heterogeneity and personalized treatment strategy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Integration and validation of complementary ex vivo assays for functional precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Organoids, organ-on-a-chip, and microtumors: Biomimetic 3D tumor models advancing drug development and precision medicine.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Clinical actionability of molecular testing in advanced thyroid cancer: a real-world cohort study.European thyroid journal · 2026Article
- Article
- FOCU.SE trial: a nationwide Swedish drug repurposing protocol and research framework.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Real-world clinical utility of tumor whole-genome sequencing in solid cancers.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Convergence of machine learning and genomics for precision oncology.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Off-target drug repurposing for rare and ultra-rare cancers: towards a scalable therapeutic framework.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Molecular reflex testing in patients with early metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer within the PROMPT-study.British journal of cancer · 2026Observational
- Celebrating Ulrik Ringborg: Multi-Omics-Based Patient Stratification for Precision Cancer Treatment.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Molecularly redefining small bowel adenocarcinoma to accelerate precision patient care - protocol of a multicenter observational cohort biomarker study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Relevant factors for policy concerning comprehensive genomic profiling in oncology: stakeholder perspectives.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Genomic profiling and expanded use of targeted anticancer drugs in solid cancers with exhausted evidence-based treatment options (PRECODE): study protocol of a prospective, non-randomized, cohort study.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients with rare cancers (incidence less than 6 cases per 100,000 persons per year) commonly have less treatment opportunities and are understudied at the level of genomic targets. We hypothesized that patients with rare cancer benefit from approved anticancer drugs outside their label similar to common cancers. EXPERIMENTAL
designIn the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), patients with therapy-refractory metastatic cancers harboring an actionable molecular profile are matched to FDA/European Medicines Agency-approved targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Patients are enrolled in parallel cohorts based on the histologic tumor type, molecular profile and study drug. Primary endpoint is clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, stable disease ≥ 16 weeks).
resultsOf 1,145 submitted cases, 500 patients, including 164 patients with rare cancers, started one of the 25 available drugs and were evaluable for treatment outcome. The overall clinical benefit rate was 33% in both the rare cancer and nonrare cancer subgroup. Inactivating alterations of CDKN2A and activating BRAF aberrations were overrepresented in patients with rare cancer compared with nonrare cancers, resulting in more matches to CDK4/6 inhibitors (14% vs. 4%; P ≤ 0.001) or BRAF inhibitors (9% vs. 1%; P ≤ 0.001). Patients with rare cancer treated with small-molecule inhibitors targeting BRAF experienced higher rates of clinical benefit (75%) than the nonrare cancer subgroup.
conclusionsComprehensive molecular testing in patients with rare cancers may identify treatment opportunities and clinical benefit similar to patients with common cancers. Our findings highlight the importance of access to broad molecular diagnostics to ensure equal treatment opportunities for all patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.