Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35046027›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

High-throughput selection of cells based on accumulated growth and division using PicoShell particles.

Mark van Zee, Joseph de Rutte, Rose Rumyan, Cayden Williamson, Trevor Burnes, Randor Radakovits, Andrew Sonico Eugenio, Sara Badih, Sohyung Lee, Dong-Hyun Lee and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Harnessing microalgae for bioproducts: innovations in synthetic biology.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Lab on a Particle Technologies.Analytical chemistry · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark van ZeeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600.ORCID 0000-0002-2487-7021
Joseph de RutteDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600.
Rose RumyanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600.
Cayden WilliamsonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600.ORCID 0000-0003-2885-5177
Trevor BurnesDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Randor RadakovitsViridos, Inc., San Diego, CA 92037.
Andrew Sonico EugenioDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Sara BadihDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600.ORCID 0000-0002-4061-6104
Sohyung LeeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600.ORCID 0000-0003-4414-8149
Dong-Hyun LeePsychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Maani ArchangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600.
Dino Di CarloDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600; dicarlo@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3942-4284
University of California, Los Angeles · USCalifornia NanoSystems Institute · USVIR Biotechnology (United States) · US

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Production of high-energy lipids by microalgae may provide a sustainable energy source that can help tackle climate change. However, microalgae engineered to produce more lipids usually grow slowly, leading to reduced overall yields. Unfortunately, culture vessels used to select cells based on growth while maintaining high biomass production, such as well plates, water-in-oil droplet emulsions, and nanowell arrays, do not provide production-relevant environments that cells experience in scaled-up cultures (e.g., bioreactors or outdoor cultivation farms). As a result, strains that are developed in the laboratory may not exhibit the same beneficial phenotypic behavior when transferred to industrial production. Here, we introduce PicoShells, picoliter-scale porous hydrogel compartments, that enable >100,000 individual cells to be compartmentalized, cultured in production-relevant environments, and selected based on growth and bioproduct accumulation traits using standard flow cytometers. PicoShells consist of a hollow inner cavity where cells are encapsulated and a porous outer shell that allows for continuous solution exchange with the external environment. PicoShells allow for cell growth directly in culture environments, such as shaking flasks and bioreactors. We experimentally demonstrate that

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesNanoparticlesNanotechnologyAnimalsBiofuelsCHO CellsCricetulusFlow CytometryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMicroalgaeMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesBiofuelsbiofuelbiomaterialshigh-throughput screeningmicrofluidicsselection

Identifiers

PMID35046027
PMCPMC8794849
OpenAlexW4205229098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.