Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35046008›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: an updated systematic review.

Carlo Ammendolia, Corey Hofkirchner, Joshua Plener, André Bussières, Michael J Schneider, James J Young, Andrea D Furlan, Kent Stuber, Aksa Ahmed, Carol Cancelliere and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The long-term clinical course of non-surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlo AmmendoliaFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada cammendolia@mtsinai.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-4961
Corey HofkirchnerGraduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua PlenerGraduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
André BussièresSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculy of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-6949
Michael J SchneiderPhysical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
James J YoungGraduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1210-3106
Andrea D FurlanToronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6138-8510
Kent StuberGraduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aksa AhmedRheumatology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carol CancelliereFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Aleisha AdeboyejoGraduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph OrnelasHealth Systems Management, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College · CAMcGill University · CAOntario Tech University · CARush University · USSinai Health System · CAToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNeurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a growing health problem in older adults. We updated our previous Cochrane review (2013) to determine the effectiveness of non-operative treatment of LSS with neurogenic claudication.

designA systematic review. DATA SOURCES: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Index to Chiropractic Literature databases were searched and updated up to 22 July 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We only included randomised controlled trials published in English where at least one arm provided data on non-operative treatment and included participants diagnosed with neurogenic claudication with imaging confirmed LSS. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used for evidence synthesis.

resultsOf 15 200 citations screened, 156 were assessed and 23 new trials were identified. There is moderate-quality evidence from three trials that: Manual therapy and exercise provides superior and clinically important short-term improvement in symptoms and function compared with medical care or community-based group exercise; manual therapy, education and exercise delivered using a cognitive-behavioural approach demonstrates superior and clinically important improvements in walking distance in the immediate to long term compared with self-directed home exercises and glucocorticoid plus lidocaine injection is more effective than lidocaine alone in improving statistical, but not clinically important improvements in pain and function in the short term. The remaining 20 new trials demonstrated low-quality or very low-quality evidence for all comparisons and outcomes, like the findings of our original review.

conclusionsThere is moderate-quality evidence that a multimodal approach which includes manual therapy and exercise, with or without education, is an effective treatment and that epidural steroids are not effective for the management of LSS with neurogenic claudication. All other non-operative interventions provided insufficient quality evidence to make conclusions on their effectiveness. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020191860.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsSpinal StenosisAgedBack PainExercise TherapyHumansLegback painclinical trialsepidemiologyneurological painpain managementspine

Identifiers

PMID35046008
PMCPMC8772406
OpenAlexW4206252191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.