Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35046002›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Provision of end-of-life care in primary care: a survey of issues and outcomes in the Australian context.

Jinfeng Ding, Claire E Johnson, Christobel Saunders, Sharon Licqurish, David Chua, Geoffrey Mitchell, Angus Cook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Concurrent Hospice Care on Primary Care Visits Among Children in Rural Southern Appalachia.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinfeng DingXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China jinfeng.ding@csu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8783-8919
Claire E JohnsonMedical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Christobel SaundersMedical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Sharon LicqurishSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David ChuaPrimary Care Clinical Unit, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Geoffrey MitchellPrimary Care Clinical Unit, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Angus CookSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
The University of Western Australia · AUThe University of Queensland · AUCentral South University · CNMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe general practitioners' (GPs) involvement in end-of-life care, continuity and outcomes of care, and reported management challenges in the Australian context.

methodsSixty-three GPs across three Australian states participated in a follow-up survey to report on care provided for decedents in the last year life using a clinic-based data collection process. The study was conducted between September 2018 and August 2019.

resultsApproximately one-third of GPs had received formal palliative care training. Practitioners considered themselves as either the primary care coordinator (53.2% of reported patients) or part of the management team (40.4% of reported patients) in the final year of care. In the last week of life, patients frequently experienced reduced appetite (80.6%), fatigue (77.9%) and psychological problems (44.9%), with GPs reporting that the alleviation of these symptoms were less than optimal. Practitioners were highly involved in end-of-life care (eg, home visits, consultations via telephone and family meetings), and perceived higher levels of satisfaction with communication with palliative care services than other external services. For one-third of patients, GPs reported that the last year of care could potentially have been improved.

conclusionThere are continuing needs for integration of palliative care training into medical education and reforms of healthcare systems to further support GPs' involvement in end-of-life care. Further, more extensive collection of clinical data is needed to evaluate and support primary care management of end-of-life patients in general practice.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHospice CareTerminal CareAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaHumansPalliative CarePrimary Health Caregeneral medicine (see internal medicine)pain managementpalliative careprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35046002
PMCPMC8772411
OpenAlexW4205542965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.