Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045995›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Investigating primary healthcare practitioners' barriers and enablers to referral of patients with COPD to pulmonary rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Jane Suzanne Watson, Rachel Elizabeth Jordan, Peymane Adab, Ivo Vlaev, Alexandra Enocson, Sheila Greenfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Barriers and Enablers for Accessing Rehabilitation Services: Findings From the Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 1-Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jane Suzanne WatsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8637-7121
Rachel Elizabeth JordanInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK r.e.jordan@bham.ac.uk.
Peymane AdabInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ivo VlaevWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Alexandra EnocsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sheila GreenfieldInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8796-4114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a highly effective, recommended intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Using behavioural theory within mixed-methods research to understand why referral remains low enables the development of targeted interventions in order to improve future PR referral.

designA multiphase sequential mixed-methods study.

settingUnited Kingdom (UK).

participants252 multiprofessional primary healthcare practitioners (PHCPs). MEASURES: Phase 1: semistructured interviews. Phase 2: a 54-item paper and online questionnaire, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Content and descriptive analysis utilised. Data mixed at two points: instrument design and interpretation.

results19 PHCPs took part in interviews and 233 responded to the survey. Integrated results revealed that PHCPs with a post qualifying respiratory qualification (154/241; 63.9%) referred more frequently (91/154; 59.1%) than those without (28/87; 32.2%). There were more barriers than enablers for referral in all 13 TDF domains. Key barriers included: infrequent engagement from PR provider to referrer, concern around patient's physical ability and access to PR (particularly for those in work), assumed poor patient motivation, no clear practice referrer and few referral opportunities. These mapped to domains: belief about capabilities, social influences, environment, optimism, skills and social and professional role. Enablers to referral were observed in knowledge, social influences memory and environment domains. Many PHCPs believed in the physical and psychological value of PR. Helpful enablers were out-of-practice support from respiratory interested colleagues, dedicated referral time (annual review) and on-screen referral prompts.

conclusionsReferral to PR is complex. Barriers outweighed enablers. Aligning these findings to behaviour change techniques will identify interventions to overcome barriers and strengthen enablers, thereby increasing referral of patients with COPD to PR.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveReferral and ConsultationDelivery of Health CareHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchchronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)primary carepulmonary rehabilitation (PR)theoretical domains framework (TDF). mixed methods research

Identifiers

PMID35045995
PMCPMC8772414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.