SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022
Drug treatment for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of different exercise-based rehabilitation programs in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension and related pulmonary hypertension populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- JPOS/JASCC clinical guidelines for psychological distress in adult cancer patients: a summary of recommendations.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Comparative effectiveness of various exercise modalities on arterial stiffness and endothelial function in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of different acupuncture-related therapies for primary trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effects of plant-derived anthocyanin- and flavanol-rich supplements on recovery outcomes after exercise-induced muscle damage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic interventions in children with functional abdominal pain disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Pharmacological effects on 35% COJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Implants for fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of physical therapies for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of ten CPMs for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of prostaglandin drugs for elevated intraocular pressure: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of acupuncture-related therapies for frozen shoulder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative clinical efficacy of acupuncture-related therapies for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The effect of SSRIs on fear learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychopharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary disease in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Pooled it
- Association between systemic lupus erythematosus and disruption of gut microbiota: a meta-analysis.Lupus science & medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify drug classes and individual selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) with high rates of remission and low risk of adverse events in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia.
designSystematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 17 June 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials that included adults aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of panic disorder, compared drugs used to treat the panic disorder, and measured the outcomes of interest, including remissions, dropouts, and adverse events.
methodsRisk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials. Direct meta-analyses were performed using random effects models. A two stage network meta-analysis with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of drug classes and individual SSRIs.
results87 studies including a total of 12 800 participants and 12 drug classes were eligible for inclusion. Almost all the studies (86/87) had some concern or were at high risk of bias. Network meta-analysis of remission with consistent results indicated that tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, SSRIs, and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were associated with significantly higher remission rates than placebo, with risk ratios of 1.39 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 1.54), 1.47 (1.36 to 1.60), 1.30 (1.00 to 1.69), 1.38 (1.26 to 1.50), and 1.27 (1.12 to 1.45), respectively. SUCRAs identified benzodiazepines (84.5%, mean rank=2.4), tricyclic antidepressants (68.7%, 3.8), and SSRIs (66.4%, 4.0) as the top three best treatments for remission. However, tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and SSRIs were also significantly associated with increased risk of adverse events compared with placebo, with risk ratios of 1.79 (1.47 to 2.19), 1.76 (1.50 to 2.06), and 1.19 (1.01 to 1.41), respectively. Consistency assumption of adverse events was upheld but could still be present on removal of studies with high percentages of women participants and those with agoraphobia. A SUCRA cluster ranking plot considering both remission and adverse events among all drug classes indicated that SSRIs were associated with high remission and low risk of adverse events. Among individual SSRIs, sertraline and escitalopram provided high remission with an acceptable risk of adverse events.
conclusionThe findings suggest that SSRIs provide high rates of remission with low risk of adverse events for the treatment of panic disorder. Among SSRIs, sertraline and escitalopram were associated with high remission and low risk of adverse events. The findings were, however, based on studies of moderate to very low certainty levels of evidence, mostly as a result of within study bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of the findings reported. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020180638.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.