Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045863›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Development of GERAS DANcing for Cognition and Exercise (DANCE): a feasibility study.

Patricia Hewston, Courtney Kennedy, George Ioannidis, Dafna Merom, Genevieve Hladysh, Sharon Marr, Justin Lee, Richard Sztramko, Laurel Trainor, Amanda Grenier and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Patricia HewstonGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada. hewstonp@hhsc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3787-7941
Courtney KennedyGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7833-0320
George IoannidisGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6956-5737
Dafna MeromSchool of Science and Health , University of Western Sydney, Penrith, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-8628
Genevieve HladyshYMCA Hamilton Burlington Brantford, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sharon MarrGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Justin LeeGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Richard SztramkoGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4140-4218
Laurel TrainorDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience, & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3397-2079
Amanda GrenierFaculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Matthew Harold WoolhouseSchool of the Arts, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-9460
Christopher PattersonGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Alexandra PapaioannouGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9412-0932

Funding

McMaster University NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDance is a mind-body activity of purposeful rhythmic movement to music. There is growing interest in using dance as a form of cognitive and physical rehabilitation. This manuscript describes the development of GERAS DANcing for Cognition and Exercise (DANCE) and evaluates its feasibility in older adults with cognitive and mobility impairments.

methodsThe progressive dance curricula were delivered for 15 weeks (1-h class; twice weekly). Participants were eligible if they were community-dwelling older adults aged 60+ with early cognitive or mobility impairment able to follow three-step commands and move independently. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment/retention, adherence, participant satisfaction, safety, and adverse events.

resultsTwenty-five older adults (mean (standard deviation [SD]) age = 77.55 (6.10) years, range 68-90 years) with early cognitive (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (SD) = 21.77 (4.05)) and mobility (92% were pre-frail/frail as indicated on the Fried Frailty Phenotype) impairments were recruited from a geriatric out-patient clinic or within the community. A total of 20/25 (80%) participants completed the study. Average class attendance was 72%, and self-reported homework adherence "most-days / every day" was 89%. A stepwise progression in the dance curricula was observed with increases in motor complexity and balance demands, and 95% of participants rated the program as a "just-right" challenge. Ninety percent of participants rated GERAS DANCE as excellent, and 100% would recommend the program to a friend or family member. Over 50% of participants connected outside of class time for a self-initiated coffee club. Adverse events of falls and fractures were reported for 2 participants, which occurred at home unrelated to the dance intervention during the study period. Pre-determined thresholds for feasibility were met for all outcomes. DISCUSSION: GERAS DANCE is a feasible and enjoyable program for older adults with early cognitive or mobility impairments. GERAS DANCE curriculum grading (duration; sequence; instructions) and motor complexity increases in agility, balance, and coordination appear appropriately tailored for this population. Future work will explore the feasibility of GERAS DANCE in new settings (i.e., virtually online, community centers, or retirement homes) and the mind-body-social benefits of dance.

Indexed as

CognitionDanceFrailtyGeriatricsRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35045863
PMCPMC8767754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.