Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045803›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2022

Does combined individualized orofacial manual therapy, pain neuroscience education, and brain training change orofacial pain, chronic face dysfunction, (facial) body perception and pain? An observational mixed methods case series study.

Harry Von Piekartz, Gesche Geitner, Dirk Möller, Robert Braun, Toby Hall

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Harry Von PiekartzFaculty of Business, Management and Social Science, Department Movement and Rehabilitation science Caprivistrasse 30a, Osnabrück Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4509-929X
Gesche GeitnerFaculty of Business, Management and Social Science, Department Movement and Rehabilitation science Caprivistrasse 30a, Osnabrück Germany.
Dirk MöllerFaculty of Business, Management and Social Science, Department Movement and Rehabilitation science Caprivistrasse 30a, Osnabrück Germany.
Robert BraunFaculty of Business, Management and Social Science, Department Psychology, Caprivistrasse 30a, Osnabrueck Germany.
Toby HallSchool for Physiotherapy, Department Psychology,School of Physiotherapy and Curtin Health Innovation Research, Curtin University Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4461-7259
Osnabrück University · DECurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrofacial pain is a complex disabling condition. Multimodal physical therapy intervention may be helpful, yet studies of such approaches are not available and are the basis of this study.

objectiveTo identify whether combined orofacial manual therapy, pain neuroscience education, graded motor imagery, and face emotional expression training has an impact on orofacial pain and associated features.

designMixed-methods case series report.

methodsEight subjects (five females) with predominant chronic unilateral face pain (mean duration 7.3 years) were given six individualized treatment sessions and a home program. The primary outcome was orofacial pain, while secondary outcomes were depression, quality of life, alexithymia, 2-point discrimination (TPD), laterality and emotional recognition, as well as qualitative analysis were evaluated post intervention.

resultsFollowing the intervention orofacial pain intensity significantly reduced (p = 0.03) from 3.0 (0.53) to 2.2 (1.75) on the Graded Chronic Pain Status questionnaire. As well, secondary outcome measures depression, alexithymia, TPD, and quality of life also significantly improved. Changes were not significant in aspects of facial perception. Qualitative analysis of perception of therapy is discussed.

conclusionMultimodal therapy had a positive outcome in terms of improvement in unilateral persistent facial pain, depression score, facial body perception and quality of life, and pain in people with chronic unilateral facial pain. Based on the qualitative analysis of their perception of the therapy, multimodal therapy had beneficial effects through increased motivation and joy to exercise.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMusculoskeletal ManipulationsBrainFacial PainFemaleHumansPerceptionQuality of Lifebody imageCase-reportfacial painmanual therapypain neuroscience education

Identifiers

PMID35045803
PMCPMC9255020
OpenAlexW4206202357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.