Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045582›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2022

Caries Risk Documentation And Prevention: eMeasures For Dental Electronic Health Records.

Suhasini Bangar, Ana Neumann, Joel M White, Alfa Yansane, Todd R Johnson, Gregory W Olson, Shwetha V Kumar, Krishna K Kookal, Aram Kim, Enihomo Obadan-Udoh and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Suhasini BangarDepartment of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Ana NeumannDepartment of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Joel M WhiteDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States.
Alfa YansaneDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States.
Todd R JohnsonDepartment of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Gregory W OlsonDepartment of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Shwetha V KumarDepartment of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Krishna K KookalDepartment of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Aram KimDepartment of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Enihomo Obadan-UdohDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States.
Elizabeth MertzDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States.
Kristen SimmonsWillamette Dental Group, Hillsboro, Oregon, United States.
Joanna MullinsWillamette Dental Group, Hillsboro, Oregon, United States.
Ryan BrandonWillamette Dental Group, Hillsboro, Oregon, United States.
Muhammad F WaljiDepartment of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Elsbeth KalenderianDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWillamette University · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
Implementing Dental Quality Measures in PracticeR01DE024166 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KALENDERIAN, ELSBETH, WALJI, MUHAMMAD · 2015 to 2025
$7.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLongitudinal patient level data available in the electronic health record (EHR) allows for the development, implementation, and validations of dental quality measures (eMeasures).

objectiveWe report the feasibility and validity of implementing two eMeasures. The eMeasures determined the proportion of patients receiving a caries risk assessment (eCRA) and corresponding appropriate risk-based preventative treatments for patients at elevated risk of caries (appropriateness of care [eAoC]) in two academic institutions and one accountable care organization, in the 2019 reporting year.

methodsBoth eMeasures define the numerator and denominator beginning at the patient level, populations' specifications, and validated the automated queries. For eCRA, patients who completed a comprehensive or periodic oral evaluation formed the denominator, and patients of any age who received a CRA formed the numerator. The eAoC evaluated the proportion of patients at elevated caries risk who received the corresponding appropriate risk-based preventative treatments.

resultsEHR automated queries identified in three sites 269,536 patients who met the inclusion criteria for receiving a CRA. The overall proportion of patients who received a CRA was 94.4% (eCRA). In eAoC, patients at elevated caries risk levels (moderate, high, or extreme) received fluoride preventive treatment ranging from 56 to 93.8%. For patients at high and extreme risk, antimicrobials were prescribed more frequently site 3 (80.6%) than sites 2 (16.7%) and 1 (2.9%).

conclusionPatient-level data available in the EHRs can be used to implement process-of-care dental eCRA and AoC, eAoC measures identify gaps in clinical practice. EHR-based measures can be useful in improving delivery of evidence-based preventative treatments to reduce risk, prevent tooth decay, and improve oral health.

Indexed as

Dental Caries SusceptibilityElectronic Health RecordsDocumentationHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID35045582
PMCPMC8769809
OpenAlexW4206826814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.