Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045156›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of general physiology2022

Functional and structural differences between skinned and intact muscle preparations.

Alex Lewalle, Kenneth S Campbell, Stuart G Campbell, Gregory N Milburn, Steven A Niederer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of general physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A combined experimental and computational analysis of mantATP turnover in skinned muscle fibers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex LewalleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Kenneth S CampbellDepartment of Physiology and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.ORCID 0000-0001-5615-5958
Stuart G CampbellDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-1527-0770
Gregory N MilburnDepartment of Physiology and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-2441
Steven A NiedererDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4612-6982

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Computer modeling of myosin binding protein C and its effects on cardiac contractionR01HL146676 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Kenneth S Campbell, Julian Stelzer · 2019 to 2026
$4.3M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001997 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PENDERGAST, JULIE S, STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2016 to 2025
$4.2M
Dual filament control of myocardial power and hemodynamicsR01HL148785 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI Kenneth S Campbell, Thomas Kampourakis · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
Multiscale modeling of inherited cardiomyopathies and therapeutic interventionsU01HL133359 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI CAMPBELL, KENNETH S, WENK, JONATHAN F · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
Length-dependent activation in human myocardiumR01HL149164 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI CAMPBELL, KENNETH S, TANNER, BERTRAND C.W. · 2020 to 2023
$2.8M
Using Atrial Mechanics To Identify Fibrosis In Patients with Atrial FibrillationR01HL152256 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ENNIS, DANIEL B · 2020 to 2023
$2.8M
British Heart Foundation PG/13/37/30280British Heart Foundation PG/15/91/31812British Heart Foundation PG/21/10534British Heart Foundation SP/18/6/33805Department of HealthEuropean Research Council ERC PREDICT-HF 864055NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001997NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146676NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148785NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149164NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152256NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL133359NIH HHS NIH R01-HL152256Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myofilaments and their associated proteins, which together constitute the sarcomeres, provide the molecular-level basis for contractile function in all muscle types. In intact muscle, sarcomere-level contraction is strongly coupled to other cellular subsystems, in particular the sarcolemmal membrane. Skinned muscle preparations (where the sarcolemma has been removed or permeabilized) are an experimental system designed to probe contractile mechanisms independently of the sarcolemma. Over the last few decades, experiments performed using permeabilized preparations have been invaluable for clarifying the understanding of contractile mechanisms in both skeletal and cardiac muscle. Today, the technique is increasingly harnessed for preclinical and/or pharmacological studies that seek to understand how interventions will impact intact muscle contraction. In this context, intrinsic functional and structural differences between skinned and intact muscle pose a major interpretational challenge. This review first surveys measurements that highlight these differences in terms of the sarcomere structure, passive and active tension generation, and calcium dependence. We then highlight the main practical challenges and caveats faced by experimentalists seeking to emulate the physiological conditions of intact muscle. Gaining an awareness of these complexities is essential for putting experiments in due perspective.

Indexed as

Myocardial ContractionSarcomeresCalciumMuscle ContractionMyocardiumMyofibrilsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID35045156
PMCPMC8929306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.