Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045120›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Covid-19 and the quality of life of people with dementia and their carers-The TFD-C19 study.

Stephanie Daley, Nicolas Farina, Laura Hughes, Elise Armsby, Nazire Akarsu, Joanna Pooley, Georgia Towson, Yvonne Feeney, Naji Tabet, Bethany Fine and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Telemedicine for cognitive impairment: a telephone survey of patients' experiences with neurological video consultation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephanie DaleyCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5842-0492
Nicolas FarinaCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Laura HughesCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Elise ArmsbyResearch and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Nazire AkarsuResearch and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Joanna PooleyResearch and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Georgia TowsonResearch and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Yvonne FeeneyCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Naji TabetCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Bethany FineResearch and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 has placed unprecedented pressure on dementia health and social care systems worldwide. This has resulted in reduced services and support for people with dementia and their family carers. There are gaps in the evidence on the impact of the pandemic on Quality of Life (QoL). We carried out a study on the impact of the pandemic on the QoL of a group of people with dementia and their family carers who were part of a larger existing cohort study.

methodsWe quantitatively measured QoL, on two occasions during the two national lockdowns in 2020 and compared these data with those obtained when they entered the study (before the pandemic). Measures used included: DEMQOL-Proxy, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and C-DEMQOL. To understand how QoL changed over time, a repeated measures ANOVA was run for each dependent variable with the following variables entered as co-variates: duration in study, baseline dementia severity, gender of the family carer, gender of the person with dementia, family carer relationship, dementia type, living status, age of the person with dementia, and age of the family carer.

results248 participants took part in the study. QoL scores did not significantly decline between either time period for the person with dementia or their family carer. There was variation in subgroups; with co-resident status, carer relationship, gender of the person with dementia, age of the person with dementia, and baseline cognitive status influencing QoL outcomes in family carers. DISCUSSION: It is striking that people with dementia and their carers did not report a decline in QoL during the pandemic or in the months following restrictions suggesting the possibility of resilience. Variation in subgroups suggests that specific groups of family carers were more vulnerable to lower QoL; indicating the need for more tailored, nuanced support during this period.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCOVID-19DementiaEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuarantineSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID35045120
PMCPMC8769363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.