Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Eye and hand movements disrupt attentional control.

Nina Maria Hanning, Luca Wollenberg, Donatas Jonikaitis, Heiner Deubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Contributions of Distinct Attention Mechanisms to Saccadic Choices in a Gamified, Dynamic Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A computational account of transsaccadic attentional allocation based on visual gain fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Presaccadic Attention Depends on Eye Movement Direction and Is Related to V1 Cortical Magnification.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina Maria HanningDepartment Psychologie, Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3640-1151
Luca WollenbergDepartment Psychologie, Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Donatas JonikaitisDepartment of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Heiner DeubelDepartment Psychologie, Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary attentional control is the ability to selectively focus on a subset of visual information in the presence of other competing stimuli-a marker of cognitive control enabling flexible, goal-driven behavior. To test its robustness, we contrasted attentional control with the most common source of attentional orienting in daily life: attention shifts prior to goal-directed eye and hand movements. In a multi-tasking paradigm, human participants attended at a location while planning eye or hand movements elsewhere. Voluntary attentional control suffered with every simultaneous action plan, even under reduced task difficulty and memory load-factors known to interfere with attentional control. Furthermore, the performance cost was limited to voluntary attention: We observed simultaneous attention benefits at two movement targets without attentional competition between them. This demonstrates that the visual system allows for the concurrent representation of multiple attentional foci. Since attentional control is extremely fragile and dominated by premotor attention shifts, we propose that action-driven selection plays the superordinate role for visual selection.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionCuesEye MovementsFemaleHandHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMovementPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSaccadesVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID35045115
PMCPMC8769330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.