Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045108›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Behavioral responses of blue-winged teal and northern shoveler to unmanned aerial vehicle surveys.

Mason D Ryckman, Kaylan Kemink, Christopher J Felege, Brian Darby, Gregory S Vandeberg, Susan N Ellis-Felege

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mason D RyckmanDepartment of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, United States of America.
Kaylan KeminkDucks Unlimited, Inc., Bismarck, ND, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1404-0690
Christopher J FelegeDepartment of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7975-219X
Brian DarbyDepartment of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, United States of America.
Gregory S VandebergGeography Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6658-086X
Susan N Ellis-FelegeDepartment of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4534-0055
University of North Dakota · USDucks Unlimited · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a popular wildlife survey tool. Most research has focused on detecting wildlife using UAVs with less known about behavioral responses. We compared the behavioral responses of breeding blue-winged teal (Spatula discors) (n = 151) and northern shovelers (Spatula clypeata) (n = 46) on wetlands flown over with a rotary DJI Matrice 200 quadcopter and control wetlands without flights. Using a GoPro camera affixed to a spotting scope, we conducted focal individual surveys and recorded duck behaviors for 30 minutes before, during, and 30 minutes after UAV flights to determine if ducks flushed or changed in specific activities. We also conducted scan surveys during flights to examine flushing and movement on the entire wetland. Between 24 April and 27 May 2020, we conducted 42 paired (control and flown) surveys. Both teal and shovelers increased proportion of time engaged in overhead vigilance on flown wetlands from pre-flight to during flight (0.008 to 0.020 and 0.006 to 0.032 of observation time, respectively). Both species left the wetland more frequently during flights than ducks on control wetlands. Despite similarities between species, we observed marked differences in time each species spent on active (e.g., feeding, courtship, swimming), resting, and vigilant behaviors during flights. Overall, teal became less active during flights (0.897 to 0.834 of time) while shovelers became more active during this period (0.724 to 0.906 of time). Based upon scan surveys, ducks flushed in 38.1% of surveys while control wetlands only had a single (2.4%) flush during the flight time. We found launch distance was the most important predictor of whether ducks swam for cover or away from the UAV which could result in inaccurate counts. Ducks appear aware of UAVs during flights, but minimal behavioral shifts suggest negative fitness consequences are unlikely.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBehavior, AnimalDucksEnvironmental MonitoringUnmanned Aerial DevicesWetlands

Identifiers

PMID35045108
PMCPMC8769346
OpenAlexW4206005633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.