Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35045099›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The COVID-19 alcohol paradox: British household purchases during 2020 compared with 2015-2019.

Peter Anderson, Amy O'Donnell, Eva Jané Llopis, Eileen Kaner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mortality and hospitalizations fully attributable to alcohol use before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evidence-based alcohol policies are the answer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Alcohol-Related Hospitalizations During the Initial COVID-19 Lockdown in Massachusetts: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter AndersonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.ORCID 0000-0003-4605-9828
Amy O'DonnellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.ORCID 0000-0003-4071-9434
Eva Jané LlopisDepartment of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Eileen KanerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

British supermarket-panel data suggest no increases in overall sales and purchases of alcohol following COVID-19 lockdowns, yet survey and mortality data suggest otherwise. This paper attempts to unravel the paradox. Based on purchase data of 79,417 British households from Kantar Worldpanel, we undertake controlled interrupted time series analysis of the impact of COVID-19 confinement introduced on 23rd March 2020, and variably applied during 2020, compared to purchases during 2015 to 2019 as controls. We also undertook Poisson regression analyses to estimate if changes in purchases differed by household socio-demographic and economic factors. Excess off-trade household alcohol purchases (expressed as grams of ethanol) following the introduction of confinement, were 29.2% higher (95% CI = 25.8% to 32.5%) for the post-confinement months of 2020, being larger until mid-July 2020 (37.5%, 95%CI = 33.9 to 41.26%) when pubs re-opened with restrictions, and smaller (24.6%, 95%CI = 21.6 to 27.7) thereafter. During the time of complete pub closures, and fully adjusting for no on-trade purchases, household purchases of alcohol did not change when compared with the same time period during 2015-2019 (coefficient = -0.9%, 95%CI = -5.6 to 3.8). Excess purchases from 23rd March to 31st December 2020 varied by region of Great Britain, being higher in the north of England, and lower in Scotland and Wales. Excess purchases were greater in the most deprived households, compared with the least deprived households. Excess purchases increased substantially as the amount of alcohol normally purchased by a household increased, with the top one fifth of households that normally bought the most alcohol increasing their purchases more than 17 times than the bottom one fifth of households that bought the least alcohol. That the heaviest buyers of alcohol increased their purchases the most, with some independent impact of socio-economic disadvantage, might explain why reported alcohol problems and recent alcohol-related death rates might have increased. A conclusion of this is that alcohol policy to reduce high consumption of alcohol, and the availability of help and treatment to reduce alcohol consumption become more important during extraordinary times, such as COVID lockdowns.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingConsumer BehaviorCOVID-19Economic FactorsFamily CharacteristicsHumansMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Social ClassUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35045099
PMCPMC8769328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.