ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2022
Robust Scatterer Number Density Segmentation of Ultrasound Images.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Migration of Deep Learning Models Across Ultrasound Scanners.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Fast and Accurate Plane Wave and Color Doppler Imaging with the FOCUS Software Package.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine-to-Machine Transfer Function in Deep Learning-Based Quantitative Ultrasound.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Article
- Calibrating Data Mismatches in Deep Learning-Based Quantitative Ultrasound Using Setting Transfer Functions.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) aims to reveal information about the tissue microstructure using backscattered echo signals from clinical scanners. Among different QUS parameters, scatterer number density is an important property that can affect the estimation of other QUS parameters. Scatterer number density can be classified into high or low scatterer densities. If there are more than ten scatterers inside the resolution cell, the envelope data are considered as fully developed speckle (FDS) and, otherwise, as underdeveloped speckle (UDS). In conventional methods, the envelope data are divided into small overlapping windows (a strategy here we refer to as patching), and statistical parameters, such as SNR and skewness, are employed to classify each patch of envelope data. However, these parameters are system-dependent, meaning that their distribution can change by the imaging settings and patch size. Therefore, reference phantoms that have known scatterer number density are imaged with the same imaging settings to mitigate system dependency. In this article, we aim to segment regions of ultrasound data without any patching. A large dataset is generated, which has different shapes of scatterer number density and mean scatterer amplitude using a fast simulation method. We employ a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the segmentation task and investigate the effect of domain shift when the network is tested on different datasets with different imaging settings. Nakagami parametric image is employed for multitask learning to improve performance. Furthermore, inspired by the reference phantom methods in QUS, a domain adaptation stage is proposed, which requires only two frames of data from FDS and UDS classes. We evaluate our method for different experimental phantoms and in vivo data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.