ArticleDrug safety2022
β-Blockers and the Risk of Depression: A Matched Case-Control Study.
Article in Drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between antihypertensive drug use and the risk of depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Beta Blocker Intoxications in Belgium: A Data Analysis with Focus on Propranolol.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SOM3355: a unique pharmacological profile combining VMAT1 inhibition, VMAT2-mediated dopamine modulation, and βFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- The Art of Nanoimmunobiotechnomedicine in Depression Management.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2025Review
- Advances in Migraine Treatment: A Comprehensive Clinical Review.Current protein & peptide science · 2025Review
- Anxiety and depression among patients with migraine: A single-center cross-sectional study in Malaysia.PloS one · 2025Article
- Real-world research on beta-blocker usage trends in China and safety exploration based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2024Article
- The protective role of ginsenoside Rg3 in heart diseases and mental disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Depression Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Associations between β-blockers and psychiatric and behavioural outcomes: A population-based cohort study of 1.4 million individuals in Sweden.PLoS medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDepression is a commonly cited adverse effect of β-blockers but the evidence for a causal relationship is limited.
objectiveWe aimed to explore whether β-blockers are associated with an increased risk of new-onset depression.
methodsWe conducted a case-control study using the UK population-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD. We identified patients aged 18-80 years with an incident depression diagnosis between 2000 and 2016, and matched controls, and estimated the risk (odds ratio [OR]) of depression in association with use of β-blockers. We also conducted analyses of exposure, categorised by number and timing of prescriptions and by indication for β-blocker use.
resultsThe study encompassed 118,705 patients with incident depression and the same number of matched controls. The odds of developing depression were increased for current short-term use of any β-blocker (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72-2.12), whereas current long-term use was not associated with the risk of depression compared with never use. The elevated risk of depression among short-term users was mostly confined to propranolol users with a neuropsychiatric disorder (aOR 6.33, 95% CI 5.16-7.76), while propranolol users with a cardiovascular indication were only at marginally increased risk of depression (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14-1.82).
conclusionsThis study suggests that the association between use of β-blockers and depression may not be causal but rather a result of protopathic bias. Propranolol is often prescribed to treat neuropsychiatric symptoms, suggesting that the onset of depression may be related to the underlying indication rather than to an effect of a β-blocker therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.