Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044637›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2022

β-Blockers and the Risk of Depression: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Delia Bornand, Daphne Reinau, Susan S Jick, Christoph R Meier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Depression Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Delia BornandBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Spitalstrasse 26, 4031, Switzerland.
Daphne ReinauBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Spitalstrasse 26, 4031, Switzerland.
Susan S JickBoston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Lexington, MA, USA.
Christoph R MeierBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Spitalstrasse 26, 4031, Switzerland. christoph.meier@usb.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-7120-6378
University of Basel · CHBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDepression is a commonly cited adverse effect of β-blockers but the evidence for a causal relationship is limited.

objectiveWe aimed to explore whether β-blockers are associated with an increased risk of new-onset depression.

methodsWe conducted a case-control study using the UK population-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD. We identified patients aged 18-80 years with an incident depression diagnosis between 2000 and 2016, and matched controls, and estimated the risk (odds ratio [OR]) of depression in association with use of β-blockers. We also conducted analyses of exposure, categorised by number and timing of prescriptions and by indication for β-blocker use.

resultsThe study encompassed 118,705 patients with incident depression and the same number of matched controls. The odds of developing depression were increased for current short-term use of any β-blocker (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72-2.12), whereas current long-term use was not associated with the risk of depression compared with never use. The elevated risk of depression among short-term users was mostly confined to propranolol users with a neuropsychiatric disorder (aOR 6.33, 95% CI 5.16-7.76), while propranolol users with a cardiovascular indication were only at marginally increased risk of depression (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14-1.82).

conclusionsThis study suggests that the association between use of β-blockers and depression may not be causal but rather a result of protopathic bias. Propranolol is often prescribed to treat neuropsychiatric symptoms, suggesting that the onset of depression may be related to the underlying indication rather than to an effect of a β-blocker therapy.

Indexed as

DepressionPropranololAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCase-Control StudiesHumansOdds RatioAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsPropranolol

Identifiers

PMID35044637
PMCPMC8857000
OpenAlexW4206161132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.