Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044585›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022

Effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil: a review.

Reza Pashaei, Pari Zahedipour-Sheshglani, Reda Dzingelevičienė, Sajjad Abbasi, Robert M Rees

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Removal of Ampicillin with Nitrifying Cultures in a SBR Reactor.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Reza PashaeiMarine Research Institute of Klaipeda University, Klaipeda, Lithuania. reza.pashaei@ku.lt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9884-6693
Pari Zahedipour-SheshglaniDepartment of Horticulture, Agriculture Faculty, Urmia University, Nazloo Ave., 144, Urmia, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5589-3879
Reda DzingelevičienėMarine Research Institute of Klaipeda University, Klaipeda, Lithuania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-9539
Sajjad AbbasiDepartment of Earth Sciences, College of Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-9334
Robert M ReesScotland's Rural College (SRUC), West Mains Rd. Edinburgh, Scotland, EH9 3JG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-8693
Klaipėda University · LTNicolaus Copernicus University · PLScotland's Rural College · GBShiraz University · IRUrmia University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil have recently become an increasingly important issue for environmental research. However, a few studies have investigated the direct effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil. Pharmaceuticals can contribute to inhibition and stimulation of nitrogen cycle processes in the environment. Some pharmaceuticals have no observable effect on the nitrogen cycle in water and soil while others appeared to inhibit or stimulate for it. This review reports on the most recent evidence of effects of pharmaceuticals on the nitrogen cycle processes by examination of the potential impact of pharmaceuticals on nitrogen fixation, nitrification, ammonification, denitrification, and anammox. Research studies have identified pharmaceuticals that can either inhibit or stimulate nitrification, ammonification, denitrification, and anammox. Among these, amoxicillin, chlortetracycline, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, narasin, norfloxacin, and sulfamethazine had the most significant effects on nitrogen cycle processes. This review also clearly demonstrates that some nitrogen transformation processes such as nitrification show much higher sensitivity to the presence of pharmaceuticals than other nitrogen transformations or flows such as mineralization or ammonia volatilization. We conclude by suggesting that future studies take a more comprehensive approach to report on pharmaceuticals' impact on the nitrogen cycle process.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsSoilAnaerobic Ammonia OxidationDenitrificationEnvironmental MonitoringNitrificationNitrogenNitrogen CycleWaterNitrogenPharmaceutical PreparationsSoilWaterAgricultureAntibioticsNitrogen transformationPharmaceuticalsPollution

Identifiers

PMID35044585
PMCPMC8766359
OpenAlexW4206055485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.