Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044508›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Effect of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline and quality of life in younger and older adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss.

Miryam Calvino, Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado, Javier Gavilán, M Auxiliadora Gutiérrez-Revilla, Rubén Polo, Luis Lassaletta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating the Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Cognitive Outcomes in Older Adults: A 5-Year Follow-Up.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miryam CalvinoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Paseo de La Castellana, 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel Sánchez-CuadradoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Paseo de La Castellana, 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Javier GavilánDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Paseo de La Castellana, 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
M Auxiliadora Gutiérrez-RevillaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Rubén PoloDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Luis LassalettaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Paseo de La Castellana, 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain. luis.lassaletta@uam.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-4523
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ES

Funding

Programa Estatal de Generación de Conocimiento y Fortalecimiento del Sistema Español de I+D+I, ISCiii PI16/00079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose(a) To measure the change in cognition, the improvement of speech perception, and the subjective benefit in people under and over 60 years following cochlear implantation. (b) To assess the relationship between cognition, demographic, audiometric, and subjective outcomes in both age groups.

methods28 cochlear implant (CI) users were assigned to the < 60y group and 35 to the ≥ 60y group. Cognition was measured using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing impaired individuals (RBANS-H); subjective benefit was measured using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ); the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI); the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI

resultsPrior to surgery: the RBANS-H total score positively correlated with the domains "Advanced sound", "Self-esteem", and "Social functioning" of NCIQ, and negatively with HADS scores. 12 months post-implantation: the RBANS-H total score increased in the < 60y (p = 0.038) and in the ≥ 60y group (p < 0.001); speech perception and subjective outcomes also improved; RBANS-H total score positively correlated with "Self-esteem" domain in NCIQ. Age and the RBANS-H total score correlated negatively in the ≥ 60y group (p = 0.026).

conclusionsAfter implantation, both age groups demonstrated improved cognition, speech perception and quality of life. Their depression scores decreased. Age was inversely associated with cognition.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCognitive DysfunctionHearing LossSpeech PerceptionAgedHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAgeCochlear implantCognitionQuality of lifeSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID35044508
PMCPMC9474541
OpenAlexW4205457979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.