ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2022
Assessment of the determinants of changes and test-retest reliability in the 6-min walk test performance over a 4-month period in healthy 6-12-year-old children.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of a High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Program on Anthropomorphic and Cardiometabolic Variables in School Children with Overweight and Obesity.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effect of Trikafta on bone density, body composition and exercise capacity in CF: A pilot study.Pediatric pulmonology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study is to establish the determinants of change in 6-min walk test (6MWT) performance observed in children aged 6-12 years over a 4-month period, and to provide test-retest reliability (4 months) to establish the minimal detectable change (MDC).
methodsHealthy children aged 6-12 years performed two 6MWT trials separated by a period of 4 months. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to estimate the percentage of variance explained by the variables potentially predictive of the change in the 6MWT. We employed the intraclass correlation coefficient to assess test-retest reliability.
resultsFifty-nine children (28 boys and 31 girls) were assessed. The change in distance covered during the 6MWT was significantly correlated with the growth in their height (r = 0.679; p < 0.05) and the change in their weight (r = 0.473; p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis shows that the change in distance covered in the 6MWT was only explained by its growth in height (46.0% explained variance). The test-retest reliability was fair-good. After 4 months, we established a 12% change from the initial measurement (79.69 m) as the MDC for a 90% confidence level (MDC
conclusionsThe distance covered in the 6MWT improved as the children's age, weight and height increased. The growth children's height was the most important predictor of change in distance covered in the 6MWT. An increase of at least 79.69 m (MDC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.