Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044491›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2022

Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Madhur Nayan, Filipe L F Carvalho, Adam S Feldman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madhur NayanDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRB 1100, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Filipe L F CarvalhoDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRB 1100, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Adam S FeldmanDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRB 1100, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. afeldman@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-9091
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionActive surveillance (AS) is an established approach in the management of low-risk, localized prostate cancer. While the use of AS to manage intermediate-risk (IR) disease has gradually increased over time, there remains uncertainty with regards to its safety, with only a minority of IR patients currently being managed with this approach. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a narrative review based on an analysis of the literature focusing on articles describing AS for IR prostate cancer. We focus on the uncertainty surrounding AS in IR disease by discussing variations in the definitions and guideline recommendations associated with IR disease, and describing the limitations of the evidence from observational studies and randomized trials.

conclusionThe safety of AS for IR disease remains unknown, given the lack of randomized trials and the limitations of the current observational studies. Further research is needed to identify select patients with IR prostate cancer that can be managed safely with AS.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingHumansMaleRisk AssessmentActive surveillanceIntermediate riskProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35044491
OpenAlexW4225730569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.