Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044490›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves.

C Andolfi, A M Lombardo, J Aizen, X Recabal, J P Walker, N S Barashi, F Reed, P J Lopez, D T Wilcox, M S Gundeti

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Pediatric robotic urologic procedures: Indications and outcomes.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Review
  19. Redo Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Children: Results from a Multicentric Series.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

C AndolfiPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Division of Biological Sciences and Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Rm J-664, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
A M LombardoThe University of Chicago Division of Biological Sciences and Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
J AizenPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Division of Biological Sciences and Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Rm J-664, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
X RecabalPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital Exequiel González Cortés & Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.
J P WalkerPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
N S BarashiPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Division of Biological Sciences and Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Rm J-664, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
F ReedPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital Exequiel González Cortés & Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.
P J LopezPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital Exequiel González Cortés & Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.
D T WilcoxPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
M S GundetiPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Division of Biological Sciences and Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Rm J-664, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. mgundeti@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Comer Children's Hospital · USClínica Alemana · CLUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the development of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopic and robotic approaches have been widely adopted. However, little has been published detailing the learning curve of MIS, especially in infants.

objectiveTo quantify the learning curve of laparoscopic (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RAL-P) for treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in infants evidenced by number of cases, operative time, success and complications. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween 2009 and 2017, we retrospectively reviewed pyeloplasty cases for treatment of UPJO in infants at three academic institutions. The primary outcome was success. Secondary outcomes were UPJO recurrence, complications, and operative time as a surrogate of skill acquisition. Continuous variables were analyzed by t test, Welch-test, and one-way ANOVA. Non-continuous variables were analyzed by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Learning curves (LC) were studied by r-to-z transformation and CUSUM.

resultsThirty-nine OP, 26 LP, and 39 RAL-P had mean operative times (OT) of 106, 121, and 151 min, respectively. LCs showed plateau in OT after 18 and 13 cases for LP and RAL-P, respectively. RAL-P showed a second phase of further improvements after 37 cases. At 16 months follow-up, there were similar rates of success and complications between the three groups.

conclusionsDespite different duration of learning phases, proficiency was achieved in both LP and RAL-P as evidenced by stabilization of operative time and similar success rates and complications to OP. Before and after achievement of proficiency, LP and RAL-P can be safely learned and implemented for treatment of UPJO in infants.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreteral ObstructionHumansInfantKidney PelvisLearning CurveRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrologic Surgical ProceduresAnderson–Hynes open dismembered pyeloplastyLaparoscopic pyeloplastyLaparoscopyRobot-assistedRobotic surgeryUPJOUreteropelvic junction obstruction

Identifiers

PMID35044490
OpenAlexW4205297498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.