Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044484›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine in the management of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan.

Keiko Takata, Masami Nakazawa, Keiichi Honda, Sayo Hashimoto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keiko TakataPostmarketing Surveillance & Pharmacoepidemiology Department, Shionogi Pharmacovigilance Center Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Masami NakazawaPostmarketing Surveillance & Pharmacoepidemiology Department, Shionogi Pharmacovigilance Center Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Keiichi HondaPostmarketing Surveillance & Pharmacoepidemiology Department, Shionogi Pharmacovigilance Center Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Sayo HashimotoPharmacovigilance Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, 1-8, Doshomachi 3-chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-0045, Japan. sayo.hashimoto@shionogi.co.jp.
Shionogi (Japan) · JPFutaba (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis prospective post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was designed to collect data on the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine in routine clinical practice in patients with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and cancer pain in Japan and explore the characteristics of patients prone to diarrhea.

methodsThe enrolled patients received naldemedine (0.2 mg, once a day) orally for up to 12 weeks. In the safety analysis, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including diarrhea as a special interest, were assessed. Effectiveness was evaluated, especially regarding the frequency and condition of bowel movement.

resultsIn the safety analysis set (n = 1177), 145 ADRs occurred in 133 (11.30%) patients, and diarrhea was the most frequent event (n = 107, 9.09%). Most cases of diarrhea were non-serious (98.1%). Most ADRs were non-serious (93.8%), and they resolved within 2 weeks (75.9%). No patient characteristics influenced the risk of diarrhea development or aggravation. Both the frequency (75.0% and 83.2%) and condition of bowel movement (80.0% and 88.0%) were improved at 2 and 12 weeks, respectively in the effectiveness analysis set (n = 953). Frequency and condition of bowel movement were also improved in patients excluded (e.g., Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was ≥ 3) or with very small numbers (e.g., received weak opioid) in the clinical trials.

conclusionsThis PMS indicates that naldemedine is well tolerated and effective in patients of various backgrounds in routine clinical practice who have OIC and cancer pain.

trial registrationUMIN000042851.

Indexed as

Cancer PainNeoplasmsOpioid-Induced ConstipationAnalgesics, OpioidConstipationHumansJapanNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidnaldemedineNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsCancerJapanNaldemedineOpioid-induced constipation (OIC)Post-marketing surveillanceSafety

Identifiers

PMID35044484
PMCPMC8942924
OpenAlexW4206112795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.