Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044474›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Intraosseous calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff yields similar outcomes to those of intratendinous lesions despite worse preoperative scores.

Emrah Caliskan, Ilker Eren, Lercan Aslan, Ozgur Koyuncu, Aksel Seyahi, Mehmet Demirhan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07409818 (A Novel Classification in Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07409818 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Classification in Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder: Evaluating MRI Localization and Related Treatment Strategies

TypeobservationalSponsorKoç UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsCalcific Tendinitis of ShoulderArmsConservative non-surgical treatment, Debridement, Side to side repair, Anchor Fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emrah CaliskanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey. dremrahcaliskan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-6571
Ilker ErenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Lercan AslanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozgur KoyuncuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aksel SeyahiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet DemirhanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Koç University · TRAmerikan Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the surgical outcomes of arthroscopic removal of intraosseous deposits in patients with intraosseous calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff.

methodsThis study involved a retrospective review of 96 patients operated on from 2004 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to the location of calcific deposits. Group I had pure tendinous involvement (n = 71), and Group II had tendinous and intraosseous involvement (n = 25). The mean follow-up time was 6.4 ± 3.9 years. There were 71 patients (46 women, 25 men) in Group I, and the mean age was 49.3 ± 8.2 years (range 30-65 years). In group II, there were 25 patients (18 women, 7 men); the mean age was 47.3 ± 11.2 years (range 28-70 years).

resultsThe mean preoperative VAS pain score was 8.8 ± 1.4 in Group I compared to 9.5 ± 0.5 in group II (p = 0.017). The median preoperative Constant and Oxford scores were 42 (20-65) and 22 (8-34) in Group I and 25.5 (22-46) and 10 (8-16) in group II, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative pain scores (Group I: 0.7 ± 1.6 and group II: 0.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.926), Constant scores [Group I: 100 (80-100) and group II: 100 (90-100), (n.s).] and Oxford scores [Group I: 48 (28-48) and group II: 46.5 (4-48), (n.s.)] between the two groups. The number of preoperative injections was higher in Group II (p = 0.05). There was no correlation between the size of the soft tissue calcific deposit and the preoperative pain, Constant, and Oxford scores (n.s.).

conclusionArthroscopic debridement of calcific tendinitis with intraosseous involvement is a safe and effective treatment method similar to that of pure tendinous involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

CalcinosisRotator Cuff InjuriesTendinopathyAdultAgedArthroscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainRotator CuffTreatment OutcomeArthroscopyCalcific tendonitisCalcifying tendinitisIntraosseous calcifying tendinitisIntratendinous calcifying tendinitisRotator cuff

Identifiers

PMID35044474
OpenAlexW4205466068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.