Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044423›Full record

SynthesisJAMA dermatology2022

Identification of Biomarkers and Critical Evaluation of Biomarker Validation in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review.

Samuel Der Sarkissian, Schapoor Hessam, Joslyn S Kirby, Michelle A Lowes, Dillon Mintoff, Haley B Naik, Hans Christian Ring, Nisha Suyien Chandran, John W Frew

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Australasian hidradenitis suppurativa management guidelines.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Genetics of Hidradenitis Suppurativa.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Samuel Der SarkissianDepartment of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Schapoor HessamDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Joslyn S KirbyDepartment of Dermatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Michelle A LowesRockefeller University, New York, New York.
Dillon MintoffDepartment of Dermatology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Haley B NaikDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco.
Hans Christian RingDepartment of Dermato-Venereology & Wound Healing Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nisha Suyien ChandranDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.
John W FrewDepartment of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKLiverpool Hospital · AUMater Dei Hospital · MTNational University Hospital · SGPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USRockefeller University · USRuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Microbial Shifts and Immune Dysregulation in Hidradenitis Suppurativa PathogenesisK23AR074531 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NAIK, HALEY · 2019 to 2023
$887k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR074531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe identification and validation of biomarkers in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has potential to improve the understanding and management of this chronic, burdensome disease.

objectiveTo systematically identify all known HS biomarkers, categorize them by biomarker type, and critically evaluate their validity according to established criteria. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Eligibility criteria for this review (PROSPERO Registration 230830) included randomized clinical trials, uncontrolled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and other observational studies with no restrictions of patient age, sex, race or ethnicity, or language of publication up until December 31, 2020. All articles were categorized into biomarker type, defined using the US Food and Drug Administration Biomarkers, Endpoints, and other Tools (BEST) glossary. Assessment of each identified biomarker was undertaken in line with the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines for the validation of proposed biomarkers. Assessment of the strength of overall data regarding individual biomarkers was undertaken using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

findingsA total of 3953 nonduplicate articles were screened, of which 1429 articles were retrieved based on the include/exclusion criteria applied. After full-text screen and data extraction, 106 articles were included in this review. The evidence of strength of 6 categories of biomarkers (susceptibility/risk, diagnostic, monitoring, predictive, prognostic, and pharmacodynamic/response biomarkers) was assessed using GRADE criteria. A total of 48 biomarkers were identified with a minimum GRADE rating of moderate. Only 1 diagnostic (serum IL-2R), 1 monitoring (dermal Doppler vascularity), and 2 predictive biomarkers (epithelialized tunnels and positive family history of HS) achieved a GRADE rating of high. None of the identified biomarkers had sufficient clinical validity to be recommended for routine use in the clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Major barriers to the identification, validation, and introduction of routine biomarkers in the management of HS include lack of independent biomarker validation studies (especially assumption-free "omics"-based techniques); insufficient assessment of collinearity between identified or proposed biomarkers; and a lack of routine integration of biomarkers into the structure of clinical trials. International consensus among researchers, clinicians, and pharmaceutical stakeholders is required to standardize goals and methods and encourage biomarker integration into future HS clinical trials. This systematic review presents a number of priorities for near-term future research to overcome such barriers and limitations of biomarkers in HS.

Indexed as

Hidradenitis SuppurativaBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesConsensusHumansPrognosisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35044423
PMCPMC9131897
OpenAlexW4205679968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.