Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044337›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2022

Vision Screening, Vision Disorders, and Impacts of Hyperopia in Young Children: Outcomes of the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Studies.

Marjean Taylor Kulp, Elise Ciner, Gui-Shuang Ying, T Rowan Candy, Bruce D Moore, Deborah Orel-Bixler, VIP Study Group, and the VIP-HIP Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Changing Natural History of Anisometropia: A Scoping Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Attention to text and pictures during storybook reading in preschool children with moderate hyperopia.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2026
    Article
  5. The QuickSee autorefractor reliably measures the accommodative response in children compared with the Shin-Nippon autorefractor.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  6. Recommended practices for vision screening in pre-school-age children: A 2025 update.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Abnormal Vision Among Preschool Children.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Refractive prescribing for preschool children by optometrists in England.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marjean Taylor KulpThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, OH, US.
Elise CinerPennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University, Elkins Park, PA, US.
Gui-Shuang YingUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, US.
T Rowan CandyIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, IN, US.
Bruce D MooreNew England College of Optometry, Boston, MA, US.
Deborah Orel-BixlerUniversity of California, Berkeley School of Optometry, Berkeley, CA, US.
VIP Study Group, and the VIP-HIP Study Group
Indiana University Bloomington · USNew England College of Optometry · USSalus University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

VISION SCREENING IN PRESCHOOLERS/CHAIR GRANTU10EY012644 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIDT, PAULETTE P · 2000 to 2004
$3.0M
Vision In Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Children (VIP-HIP)R01EY021141 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CINER, ELISE B, KULP, MARJEAN T · 2011 to 2013
$2.6M
COORDINATING CENTER: VISION IN PRESCHOOLERSU10EY012547 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAGUIRE, MAUREEN G · 2000 to 2005
$2.1M
VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS (VIP) STUDYU10EY012647 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI OREL-BIXLER, DEBORAH A · 2000 to 2004
$2.0M
VISION SCREENING IN PRESCHOOLERS/TOSU CLINICAL CENTERU10EY012648 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KULP, MARJEAN T · 2000 to 2004
$1.9M
VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS STUDYU10EY012550 · NEI · NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CYERT, LYNN A · 2000 to 2004
$1.8M
VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS (VIP) STUDYU10EY012534 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI MOORE, BRUCE D · 2000 to 2004
$1.8M
VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS STUDYU10EY012545 · NEI · SALUS UNIVERSITY · PI CINER, ELISE B · 2000 to 2004
$1.7M
Analysis of the Data from Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) StudyR21EY018908 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YING, GUI-SHUANG · 2009 to 2010
$397k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021141NEI NIH HHS R21 EY018908NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012534NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012545NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012547NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012550NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012644NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012647NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThis review summarizes clinically relevant outcomes from the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and VIP-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) studies. In VIP, refraction tests (retinoscopy, Retinomax, SureSight) and Lea Symbols Visual Acuity performed best in identifying children with vision disorders. For lay screeners, Lea Symbols single, crowded visual acuity (VA) testing (VIP, 5-foot) was significantly better than linear, crowded testing (10-foot). Children unable to perform the tests (<2%) were more likely to have vision disorders than children who passed and should be referred for vision evaluation. Among racial/ethnic groups, the prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus was similar while that of hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia varied. The presence of strabismus and significant refractive errors were risk factors for unilateral amblyopia, while bilateral astigmatism and bilateral hyperopia were risk factors for bilateral amblyopia. A greater risk of astigmatism was associated with Hispanic, African American, and Asian race, and myopic and hyperopic refractive error. The presence and severity of hyperopia were associated with higher rates of amblyopia, strabismus, and other associated refractive error. In the VIP-HIP study, compared to emmetropes, meaningful deficits in early literacy were observed in uncorrected hyperopic 4- and 5-year-olds [≥+4.0 diopter (D) or ≥+3.0 D to ≤+6.0 D associated with reduced near visual function (near VA 20/40 or worse; stereoacuity worse than 240")]. Hyperopia with reduced near visual function also was associated with attention deficits. Compared to emmetropic children, VA (distance, near), accommodative accuracy, and stereoacuity were significantly reduced in moderate hyperopes, with the greatest risk in those with higher hyperopia. Increasing hyperopia was associated with decreasing visual function.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaHyperopiaRefractive ErrorsVision ScreeningChildChild, PreschoolHumansVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID35044337
PMCPMC8813881
OpenAlexW4205603866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.