Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044319›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Patient Utilization of Online Information and its Influence on Orthopedic Surgeon Selection: Cross-sectional Survey of Patient Beliefs and Behaviors.

Victor Hoang, Amit Parekh, Kevin Sagers, Trevor Call, Shain Howard, Jason Hoffman, Daniel Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Below-Knee Amputations: A Qualitative Social Media Analysis of Perceived Outcomes.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor Hoang *Valley Hospital Medical Center, Las Vegas, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3342-8081
Amit ParekhValley Hospital Medical Center, Las Vegas, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-109X
Kevin SagersValley Hospital Medical Center, Las Vegas, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6614-5016
Trevor CallValley Hospital Medical Center, Las Vegas, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0606-1106
Shain HowardValley Hospital Medical Center, Las Vegas, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8531-4302
Jason HoffmanValley Hospital Medical Center, Las Vegas, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1645-0906
Daniel LeeValley Hospital Medical Center, Las Vegas, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-2664
Valley Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient attitudes and behavior are critical to understand owing to the increasing role of patient choice. There is a paucity of investigation into the perceived credibility of online information and whether such information impacts how patients choose their surgeons.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to explore the attitudes and behavior of patients regarding online information and orthopedic surgeon selection. Secondary purposes included gaining insight into the relative importance of provider selection factors, and their association with patient age and education level.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study involving five multispecialty orthopedic surgery groups. A total of 329 patients who sought treatment by six different orthopedic surgeons were asked to anonymously answer a questionnaire consisting of 25 questions. Four questions regarded demographic information, 10 questions asked patients to rate the importance of specific criteria regarding the selection of their orthopedic surgeon (on a 4-point Likert scale), and 6 questions were designed to determine patient attitude and behaviors related to online information.

resultsPatient-reported referral sources included the emergency room (29/329, 8.8%), friend (42/329, 12.8%), insurance company (47/329, 14.3%), internet search/website (28/329, 8.5%), primary care physician (148/329, 45.0%), and other (34/329, 10.3%). Among the 329 patients, 130 (39.5%) reported that they searched the internet for information before their first visit. There was a trend of increased belief in online information to be accurate and complete in younger age groups (P=.02). There was an increased relative frequency in younger groups to perceive physician rating websites to be unbiased (P=.003), provide sufficient patient satisfaction information (P=.01), and information about physician education and training (P=.03). There was a significant trend for patients that found a surgeon's website to be useful (P<.001), with the relative frequency increased in younger age groups.

conclusionsThis study shows that insurance network, physician referrals, appointment availability, and office location are important to patients, whereas advertising and internet reviews by other patients were considered to be not as helpful in choosing an orthopedic surgeon. Future studies may seek to identify obstacles to patients in integrating online resources for decision-making and strategies to improve health-seeking behaviors.

Indexed as

health literacyinternet reviewsorthopedicspatient choicepatient decisionpatient online reviewphysician perceptionphysician selectionpracticepractice managementsocial media

Identifiers

PMID35044319
PMCPMC8811697
OpenAlexW3217760302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.