Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044303›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Digital Biomarkers for Supporting Transitional Care Decisions: Protocol for a Transnational Feasibility Study.

Despoina Petsani, Sara Ahmed, Vasileia Petronikolou, Eva Kehayia, Mika Alastalo, Teemu Santonen, Beatriz Merino-Barbancho, Gloria Cea, Sofia Segkouli, Thanos G Stavropoulos and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Despoina PetsaniMedical Physics and Digital Innovation Laboratory, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0273-6890
Sara AhmedFaculty of Medicine, School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-6790
Vasileia PetronikolouMedical Physics and Digital Innovation Laboratory, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6878-8418
Eva KehayiaFaculty of Medicine, School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4463-1376
Mika AlastaloLaurea University of Applied Sciences, Vantaa, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-1879
Teemu SantonenLaurea University of Applied Sciences, Vantaa, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-6472
Beatriz Merino-BarbanchoLife Supporting Technologies, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-4178
Gloria CeaLife Supporting Technologies, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-4672
Sofia SegkouliCentre for Research & Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-0451
Thanos G StavropoulosCentre for Research & Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-4329
Antonis BillisMedical Physics and Digital Innovation Laboratory, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1854-7560
Michael DoumasSecond Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital "Hippokration", Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-8044
Rosa AlmeidaFundación INTRAS, RDi Projects Department, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3721-7214
Enikő NagyNagykovácsi Wellbeing Living Lab, Nagykovácsi, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1868-5290
Leen BroeckxThomas More University of Applied Sciences - LiCalab, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2067-6182
Panagiotis Bamidis *Medical Physics and Digital Innovation Laboratory, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-5805
Evdokimos Konstantinidis *Medical Physics and Digital Innovation Laboratory, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5522-9553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Infrastructure is a Horizon 2020 project that aims to harmonize Living Lab procedures and facilitate access to European health and well-being research infrastructures. In this context, this study presents a joint research activity that will be conducted within Virtual Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Infrastructure in the transitional care domain to test and validate the harmonized Living Lab procedures and infrastructures. The collection of data from various sources (information and communications technology and clinical and patient-reported outcome measures) demonstrated the capacity to assess risk and support decisions during care transitions, but there is no harmonized way of combining this information.

objectiveThis study primarily aims to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of collecting multichannel data across Living Labs on the topic of transitional care and to harmonize data processes and collection. In addition, the authors aim to investigate the collection and use of digital biomarkers and explore initial patterns in the data that demonstrate the potential to predict transition outcomes, such as readmissions and adverse events.

methodsThe current research protocol presents a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study that will consist of three phases, running consecutively in multiple sites: a cocreation phase, a testing and simulation phase, and a transnational pilot phase. The cocreation phase aims to build a common understanding among different sites, investigate the differences in hospitalization discharge management among countries, and the willingness of different stakeholders to use technological solutions in the transitional care process. The testing and simulation phase aims to explore ways of integrating observation of a patient's clinical condition, patient involvement, and discharge education in transitional care. The objective of the simulation phase is to evaluate the feasibility and the barriers faced by health care professionals in assessing transition readiness.

resultsThe cocreation phase will be completed by April 2022. The testing and simulation phase will begin in September 2022 and will partially overlap with the deployment of the transnational pilot phase that will start in the same month. The data collection of the transnational pilots will be finalized by the end of June 2023. Data processing is expected to be completed by March 2024. The results will consist of guidelines and implementation pathways for large-scale studies and an analysis for identifying initial patterns in the acquired data.

conclusionsThe knowledge acquired through this research will lead to harmonized procedures and data collection for Living Labs that support transitions in care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/34573.

Indexed as

cocreationfeasibility studyLiving Labtechnologytransitional care

Identifiers

PMID35044303
PMCPMC8811685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.