Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044275›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2022

Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward.

Lara B Aknin, Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, Elizabeth W Dunn, Daisy E Fancourt, Elkhonon Goldberg, John F Helliwell, Sarah P Jones, Elie Karam, Richard Layard, Sonja Lyubomirsky and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 232 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
232citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
74.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

232 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 426 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Trends in depressive symptoms in Germany's adult population 2008-2023.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

172 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.

Lara B AkninDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.
Jan-Emmanuel De NeveSaïd Business School, University of Oxford.
Elizabeth W DunnDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
Daisy E FancourtInstitute of Epidemiology and Health, University College London.
Elkhonon GoldbergDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine.
John F HelliwellVancouver School of Economics, University of British Columbia.
Sarah P JonesDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London.
Elie KaramDepartment of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center.
Richard LayardCentre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Sonja LyubomirskyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside.ORCID 0000-0003-0727-5595
Andrew RzepaGlobal Food Security Program, Gallup Inc., London, England.
Shekhar SaxenaDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Emily M ThorntonDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.
Tyler J VanderWeeleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Ashley V WhillansNegotiations, Organizations and Markets Unit, Harvard Business School.ORCID 0000-0002-1726-6978
Jamil ZakiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0002-0664-2982
Ozge KaradagCenter for Sustainable Development, Columbia University.
Yanis Ben AmorCenter for Sustainable Development, Columbia University.ORCID 0000-0003-1278-8715
Columbia University · USHarvard University · USSimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAHarvard Global Health Institute · USImperial College London · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBNew York University · USSaint George Hospital · LBStanford University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has infected millions of people and upended the lives of most humans on the planet. Researchers from across the psychological sciences have sought to document and investigate the impact of COVID-19 in myriad ways, causing an explosion of research that is broad in scope, varied in methods, and challenging to consolidate. Because policy and practice aimed at helping people live healthier and happier lives requires insight from robust patterns of evidence, this article provides a rapid and thorough summary of high-quality studies available through early 2021 examining the mental-health consequences of living through the COVID-19 pandemic. Our review of the evidence indicates that anxiety, depression, and distress increased in the early months of the pandemic. Meanwhile, suicide rates, life satisfaction, and loneliness remained largely stable throughout the first year of the pandemic. In response to these insights, we present seven recommendations (one urgent, two short-term, and four ongoing) to support mental health during the pandemic and beyond.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansLonelinessMental HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19lonelinessmental healthpsychological distressself-harmsocial connectionsubjective well-beingsuicide

Identifiers

PMID35044275
PMCPMC9274782
OpenAlexW3164037603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.