Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044268›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2022

Niche Diversity Predicts Personality Structure Across 115 Nations.

Patrick K Durkee, Aaron W Lukaszewski, Christopher R von Rueden, Michael D Gurven, David M Buss, Elliot M Tucker-Drob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Aversive societal conditions explain differences in "dark" personality across countries and US states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary psychiatry: foundations, progress and challenges.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick K DurkeeDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0001-6159-4277
Aaron W LukaszewskiDepartment of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton.
Christopher R von RuedenJepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond.
Michael D GurvenDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara.
David M BussDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
Elliot M Tucker-DrobDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
The University of Texas at Austin · USCalifornia State University, Fullerton · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Richmond · US

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The niche-diversity hypothesis proposes that personality structure arises from the affordances of unique trait combinations within a society. It predicts that personality traits will be both more variable and differentiated in populations with more distinct social and ecological niches. Prior tests of this hypothesis in 55 nations suffered from potential confounds associated with differences in the measurement properties of personality scales across groups. Using psychometric methods for the approximation of cross-national measurement invariance, we tested the niche-diversity hypothesis in a sample of 115 nations (

Indexed as

PersonalityPersonality DisordersHumansPsychometricsalignmentBig Fivecross-culturalniche diversitypersonality

Identifiers

PMID35044268
PMCPMC13171031
OpenAlexW4225662552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.