Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044252›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2022

Prognostic Factors for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Bone Injury in Elderly Patients.

Hideaki Nakajima, Noriaki Yokogawa, Takeshi Sasagawa, Kei Ando, Naoki Segi, Kota Watanabe, Satoshi Nori, Shuji Watanabe, Kazuya Honjoh, Toru Funayama and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A deep learning-based prediction model for prognosis of cervical spine injury: a Japanese multicenter survey.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Hideaki NakajimaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Noriaki YokogawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Takeshi SasagawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Kei AndoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Naoki SegiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kota WatanabeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi NoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuji WatanabeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Kazuya HonjohDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Toru FunayamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki,Japan.
Fumihiko EtoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yoshinori TerashimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ryosuke HirotaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Takeo FuruyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate school of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Tomohiro YamadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Gen InoueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa,Japan.
Takashi KaitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine,Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi KatoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan.
JASA Study Group
Kanazawa University · JPUniversity of Fukui · JPKeio University · JPNagoya University · JPSapporo Medical University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPChiba University · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPKitasato University · JPOsaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current aging society, there has been a marked increase in the incidence of cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major bone injury. This multi-center study aimed to identify predictors of neurological improvement in elderly patients with CSCI without major bone injury. The participants were 591 patients aged ≥65 years with CSCI without major bone injury and a minimum follow-up period of three months. Neurologic status was defined using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale (AIS). Univariate and multi-variate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for walking recovery in AIS A-C cases and full upper extremity motor recovery in AIS D cases. In AIS A-C cases, body mass index (odds ratio (OR): 1.112), magnetic resonance imaging signal change (OR: 0.240), AIS on admission (OR: 3.497), comorbidity of dementia/delirium (OR: 0.365), and post-injury pneumonia (OR: 0.194) were identified as independent prognostic factors for walking recovery. The prevalence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OR: 0.494) was also found to be an independent prognostic factor in AIS B and C cases only. In AIS D cases, age (OR: 0.937), upper extremity ASIA motor score on admission (OR: 1.230 [per 5 scores]), and operation (OR: 0.519) were independent prognostic factors for full motor recovery. The severity of AIS at admission was the strongest predictor of functional outcomes. Promoting rehabilitation, however, through measures to reduce cognitive changes, post-injury pneumonia, and unhealthy body weight changes can contribute to greater neurological improvement in AIS A-C cases.

Indexed as

Cervical CordNeck InjuriesPneumoniaSpinal Cord InjuriesAgedHumansPrognosisRecovery of FunctionRetrospective Studiescervical spinal cord injuryelderly patientsmulti-variate analysisneurological improvementno major bone injuryprognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID35044252
PMCPMC9081051
OpenAlexW4205128073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.