ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2022
Longitudinal effects of one-leg standing time on neuropathy outcomes in association with glycemic control in non-elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations of age-adjusted coefficient of variation of R-R intervals with autonomic and peripheral nerve function in non-elderly persons with diabetes.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Article
- Prevalence and characteristics of diabetic symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: The Japan Diabetes Complication and its Prevention Prospective study (JDCP study 10).Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Article
- Prevalence and characteristics of diabetic symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: the Japan Diabetes Complication and its Prevention Prospective study (JDCP study 10).Diabetology international · 2024Article
- Longitudinal effects of one-leg standing time on neuropathy outcomes in association with glycemic control in non-elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS/
introductionDiabetic neuropathy leads to postural instability. This study compared longitudinal changes in neuropathy outcomes relative to long-term glycemic control in patients aged <60 years with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes with and without a short one-leg standing time (OLST <60 s). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, 58 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] >7.0%; aged 17-59 years), who underwent re-evaluation of neuropathic sensory symptoms, ankle reflexes and nerve conduction attributes, and cardiac autonomic function (R-R interval), >1 year after discharge were divided into OLST <60 and ≥60 s groups. Patients were followed up every 2-3 months for HbA1c levels for up to 8 years. Neuropathy outcomes relative to OLST and HbA1c levels at baseline and over follow up were compared.
resultsAdditional development of sensory symptoms (one patient) and abnormal ankle reflexes (five patients) were identified during follow up, and decreased peripheral and cardiac autonomic function at both baseline and follow up, only in patients with OLST <60 s. Mean HbA1c levels were significantly higher in patients with OLST <60 s versus ≥60 s (7.8 ± 0.9% vs 7.2 ± 1.2%; P = 0.022). Better glycemic control during follow up was associated with better neuropathy outcomes only in patients with OLST ≥60 s.
conclusionNon-elderly type 2 diabetes patients with OLST <60 s and decreased peripheral nerve function at baseline are at increased risk for intractable diabetic neuropathy. Better glycemic control alone might not improve neuropathy outcomes in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.