Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044090›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2022

Emergent intra-pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

Liza E Brusman, David S W Protter, Allison C Fultz, Maya U Paulson, Gabriel D Chapel, Isaiah O Elges, Ryan T Cameron, Annaliese K Beery, Zoe R Donaldson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Social attachment shapes interbrain synchrony.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liza E BrusmanDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1833-5939
David S W ProtterDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Allison C FultzDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Maya U PaulsonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Gabriel D ChapelDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Isaiah O ElgesDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Ryan T CameronDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Annaliese K BeeryDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1249-9182
Zoe R DonaldsonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-7905
University of Colorado Boulder · USAcupuncture & Integrative Medicine College · US

Funding

TRAINING IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION &CELL CYCLE REGULATIONT32GM008759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI AHN, NATALIE G. · 2000 to 2020
$5.9M
Predoctoral Training Program in Signaling and Cellular Regulation INCLUDE Down Syndrome SupplementT32GM142607 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Sabrina Leigh Spencer, Tin Tin Su · 2021 to 2026
$3.6M
The neuromolecular basis of adaptation to bond lossR01MH125423 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Zoe Rebecca Donaldson · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
Neuronal basis of social motivation and the failure to adapt to lossDP2MH119427 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI DONALDSON, ZOE REBECCA · 2018 to 2019
$2.5M
Reward mechanisms supporting affiliation between peersR15MH113085 · NIMH · SMITH COLLEGE · PI BEERY, ANNALIESE K. · 2017 to 2017
$361k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008759NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142607NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH119427NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125423NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH113085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pair bonding animals, coordinated behavior between partners is required for the pair to accomplish shared goals such as raising young. Despite this, experimental designs rarely assess the behavior of both partners within a bonded pair. Thus, we lack an understanding of the interdependent behavioral dynamics between partners that likely facilitate relationship success. To identify intra-pair behavioral correlates of pair bonding, we used socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and tested both partners using social choice and non-choice tests at short- and long-term pairing timepoints. Females developed a preference for their partner more rapidly than males, with preference driven by different behaviors in each sex. Further, as bonds matured, intra-pair behavioral sex differences and organized behavior emerged-females consistently huddled more with their partner than males did regardless of overall intra-pair affiliation levels. When animals were allowed to freely interact with a partner or a novel vole in sequential free interaction tests, pairs spent more time interacting together than either animal did with a novel vole, consistent with partner preference in the more commonly employed choice test. Total pair interaction in freely moving voles was correlated with female, but not male, behavior. Via a social operant paradigm, we found that pair-bonded females, but not males, are more motivated to access and huddle with their partner than a novel vole. Together, our data indicate that as pair bonds mature, sex differences and organized behavior emerge within pairs, and that these intra-pair behavioral changes are likely organized and driven by the female animal.

Indexed as

GrasslandSex CharacteristicsAnimalsArvicolinaeDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleMaleSexual Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorDNA-Binding Proteinsaffiliationexperience-dependent changesorganized behaviorpair bondprairie volesex differencessocial choicesocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID35044090
PMCPMC8917086
OpenAlexW4206390738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.