Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044081›Full record

ReviewPediatric blood & cancer2022

Implementation science in pediatric oncology: A narrative review and future directions.

Charles A Phillips, Lamia P Barakat, Brad H Pollock, L Charles Bailey, Rinad S Beidas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Implementing health promotion interventions in a pediatric oncology setting: A qualitative study among families impacted by cancer and healthcare professionals.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  7. Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  8. Usability Evaluation of the RevisedChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Dislodgement Rates of Tunneled Femoral Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Pediatric Oncology Patients.Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charles A PhillipsDivision of Oncology, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-1673
Lamia P BarakatDivision of Oncology, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-0938-4712
Brad H PollockDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4415-8638
L Charles BaileyDivision of Oncology, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8967-0662
Rinad S BeidasDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6056-6071

Funding

Research ProgramP50CA244690 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUTTENHEIM, ALISON MEREDITH · 2020 to 2024
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation science (IS) has garnered attention within oncology, and most prior IS work has focused on adult, not pediatric, oncology. This narrative review broadly characterizes IS for pediatric oncology. It includes studies through 2020 using the following search terms in PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane: "implementation science," "pediatric," "childhood," "cancer," and "oncology." Systematic review was not performed due to the limited number of heterogeneous studies. Of 216 articles initially reviewed, nine were selected as specific to IS and pediatric oncology. All nine examined oncologic supportive care, cancer prevention, or cancer control. The supportive care focus is potentially due to the presence of cooperative study groups such as the Children's Oncology Group, which efficiently drive cancer-directed therapy changes through clinical trials. Future IS within pediatric oncology should embrace this ecosystem and focus on cancer control interventions that benefit patients across multiple cancer types and patients treated outside cooperative group studies.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceNeoplasmsAdultChildEcosystemHumansMedical Oncologyimplementation sciencepediatric cancerpediatric oncologysupportive care

Identifiers

PMID35044081
PMCPMC8860875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.