Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35044073›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Deep learning-based convolutional neural network for intramodality brain MRI synthesis.

Alexander F I Osman, Nissren M Tamam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Regression Is All You Need for Medical Image Translation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Deep learning method for magnetic resonance imaging fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image synthesis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander F I OsmanDepartment of Medical Physics, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, 11121, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-475X
Nissren M TamamDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P. O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Neelain University · SDPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SA

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers PNURSP2022R12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe existence of multicontrast magnetic resonance (MR) images increases the level of clinical information available for the diagnosis and treatment of brain cancer patients. However, acquiring the complete set of multicontrast MR images is not always practically feasible. In this study, we developed a state-of-the-art deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) for image-to-image translation across three standards MRI contrasts for the brain.

methodsBRATS'2018 MRI dataset of 477 patients clinically diagnosed with glioma brain cancer was used in this study, with each patient having T1-weighted (T1), T2-weighted (T2), and FLAIR contrasts. It was randomly split into 64%, 16%, and 20% as training, validation, and test set, respectively. We developed a U-Net model to learn the nonlinear mapping of a source image contrast to a target image contrast across three MRI contrasts. The model was trained and validated with 2D paired MR images using a mean-squared error (MSE) cost function, Adam optimizer with 0.001 learning rate, and 120 epochs with a batch size of 32. The generated synthetic-MR images were evaluated against the ground-truth images by computing the MSE, mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM).

resultsThe generated synthetic-MR images with our model were nearly indistinguishable from the real images on the testing dataset for all translations, except synthetic FLAIR images had slightly lower quality and exhibited loss of details. The range of average PSNR, MSE, MAE, and SSIM values over the six translations were 29.44-33.25 dB, 0.0005-0.0012, 0.0086-0.0149, and 0.932-0.946, respectively. Our results were as good as the best-reported results by other deep learning models on BRATS datasets.

conclusionsOur U-Net model exhibited that it can accurately perform image-to-image translation across brain MRI contrasts. It could hold great promise for clinical use for improved clinical decision-making and better diagnosis of brain cancer patients due to the availability of multicontrast MRIs. This approach may be clinically relevant and setting a significant step to efficiently fill a gap of absent MR sequences without additional scanning.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, Computerbrain cancerconvolutional neural networkdeep learningmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)medical imaging synthesis

Identifiers

PMID35044073
PMCPMC8992958
OpenAlexW4205468380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.